Although the “right not to know” is well established in international regulations, it has been heavily debated. Ubiquitous results from extended exome and genome analysis have challenged the right not to know. American College of Medical Ge... View more
1. Chen R, Mias GI, Li-Pook-Than J, et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell. 2012;148(6):1293-307. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.009 [published Online First: Epub Date].
2. Cheon JY, Mozersky J, Cook-Deegan R. Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA: a harbinger of ethical and policy issues to come? Genome Med. 2014;6(12):121. doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0121-3 [published Online First: Epub Date].
3. Uninformed consent. New tests raise questions over right not to know test results. Hospital ethics / American Hospital Association. 1995.11(4):10-1.
4. Andorno R. The right not to know: an autonomy based approach. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(5):435-9. doi:10.1136/jme.2002.001578. discussion 39-40 [published Online First: Epub Date].
5. Green J, Kentish J. The right not to know HIV-test results. Lancet. 1995; 345(8963):1508.
6. Kielstein R, Sass HM. Right not to know or duty to know? Prenatal screening for polycystic renal disease. J Med Philos. 1992;17(4):395-405.
7. Laurie GT. In defence of ignorance: genetic information and the right not to know. Eur J Health Law. 1999;6(2):119-32.
8. Malpas P. The right to remain in ignorance about genetic information-can such a right be defended in the name of autonomy? N Z Med J. 2005; 118(1220):U1611.
9. Neumann H. Patients have the right not to know. Med World News. 1980; 21(13):63.
10. Raikka J. Freedom and a right (not) to know. Bioethics. 1998;12(1):49-63.