Intended and unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption: A review of extant evidence and suggestions for future research

Research, Preprint OPEN
Ulf Brüggemann ; Jörg-Markus Hitz ; Thorsten Sellhorn (2012)
  • Publisher: SFB 649, Economic Risk Berlin
  • Subject: Publizitätspflicht | Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse | Rechtsangleichung | G38 | K12 | K34 | review | International accounting, IFRS adoption, economic consequences, contracting, regulation, review | international accounting | Welt | K22 | M41 | International Financial Reporting Standards | IFRS adoption | M48 | regulation | economic consequences | Bilanzrecht | contracting
    • ddc: ddc:330
      jel: jel:G38 | jel:K12 | jel:K34 | jel:M48 | jel:K22 | jel:M41

This paper discusses empirical evidence on the economic consequences of mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the European Union (EU) and provides suggestions on how future research can add to our understanding of these effects. Based on the explicitly stated objectives of the EU‟s so-called „IAS Regulation‟, we distinguish between intended and unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption. Empirical research on the intended consequences generally fails to document an increase in the comparability or transparency of financial statements. In contrast, there is rich and almost unanimous evidence of positive effects on capital markets and at the macroeconomic level. We argue that certain research design issues are likely to contribute to this apparent mismatch in findings and we suggest areas for future research to address it. The literature investigating unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption is still in its infancy. However, extant empirical evidence and insights from non-IFRS settings suggest that mandatory IFRS adoption has the potential to materially affect contractual outcomes. We conclude that both the intended and the unintended consequences deserve further scrutiny to assess the costs and benefits of mandatory IFRS adoption, which may help provide a basis for evaluating the effectiveness of the IAS Regulation. We provide specific guidance for future research in this field.
  • References (77)
    77 references, page 1 of 8

    AcSB (Accounting Standards Board) (2010) Exposure Draft: Adoption of IFRSs by Entities with Rate-regulated Activities. July 2010.

    AGFRC (Australian Government Financial Reporting Council) (2002) Adoption of International Accounting Standards by 2005. Bulletin 2002/4 of 3 July 2002.

    Aharony, J., Barniv, R., and H. Falk (2010) „The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on equity valuation of accounting numbers for security investors in the EU‟, European Accounting Review, 19(3), pp. 535-78.

    Ahmed, A. S., Neel, M., and D. Wang (2012) „Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence‟, Working paper, Texas A & M University.

    Amir, E., Guan, Y., and D. Oswald (2010) „The effect of pension accounting on corporate pension asset allocation‟, Review of Accounting Studies, 15(2), pp. 345-66.

    Amiram, D. (2009) „Financial information globalization and foreign investment decisions‟, Working paper, University of North Carolina.

    Armstrong, C. S., Barth, M. E., Jagolinzer, A. D., and E. J. Riedl (2010) „Market reaction to the adoption of IFRS in Europe‟, The Accounting Review, 85(1), pp. 31-61.

    Arya, A., Glover, J., Mittendorf, B., and G. Narayanamoorthy (2005) „Unintended consequences of regulation disclosures: the case of Regulation Fair Disclosure‟, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(3), pp. 243-52.

    Atwood, T. J., Drake, M. S., Myers, J. N., and L. A. Myers (2011) „Do earnings reported under IFRS tell us more about future earnings and cash flows?‟, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), pp. 103-21.

    Ball, R. (2006) „International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors‟, Accounting and Business Research, Special Issue: International Accounting Policy Forum, pp. 5-27.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark