Actions
  • shareshare
  • link
  • cite
  • add
add
auto_awesome_motion View all 2 versions
Publication . Article . 2017

Good News in Bad News:How Negativity Enhances Economic Efficacy

Svensson, H.M.; Albæk, E.; van Dalen, A.; de Vreese, C.;
Open Access
English
Published: 01 Jan 2017
Abstract

Negativity is a news ideology, and its negative effects on attitude formation are widely documented. Contrary to this view, the present study demonstrates that negative economic news can in fact be good news. Based on a two-wave national panel survey and a media content analysis, we show that individual exposure to negative economic news enhances internal economic efficacy, a sense of competence in and understanding of the economy. This is good news as internal economic efficacy may facilitate economic evaluations and decision making. The study reveals that changes in economic efficacy are driven by news attention aroused by the negative tone. However, not all individuals are susceptible to such media effects. Higher interest in economic news lowers the impact of negativity on attention arousal.

Related Organizations
46 references, page 1 of 5

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. London, UK: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34(3), 341-367.

Becker, A. B. (2011). Political humor as democratic relief? The effects of exposure to comedy and straight news on trust and efficacy. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19(5), 235-250.

Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210-224. [OpenAIRE]

Chaffee, S. H., & Kanihan, S. F. (1997). Learning about politics from mass media. Political Communication, 14(4), 421-430.

Chaffee, S. H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13(1), 76-107. [OpenAIRE]

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy: I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore. American Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 50-78. [OpenAIRE]

Elmelund-Praestekaer, C., & Mølgaard Svensson, H. (2014). Negative and personalized campaign rhetoric: Party communication in and media coverage of Danish parliamentary elections 1994-2011. World Political Science Review, 10(2), 365-384.

Eveland, W. P., Hutchens, M. J., & Shen, F. (2009). Exposure, attention, or “use” of news? Assessing aspects of the reliability and validity of a central concept in political communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 3(4), 223-244.

Download fromView all 2 sources
lock_open
NARCIS
Article . 2017
Providers: NARCIS
moresidebar