The Political Man and Contingent Valuation: Motives Do Count

Research, Preprint OPEN
Nyborg, Karine;
  • Publisher: Oslo: Statistics Norway, Research Department
  • Subject: JEL classification: A13 | Environmental valuation; social welfare judgements; non-unique preference orderings. | JEL classification: D11 | D62 | Willingness to pay | JEL classification: H41 | A13 | H41 | D11 | JEL classification: D61 | Q21 | Social welfare | Environmental valuation | non-unique preference orderings. | JEL classification: Q21 | social welfare judgements | D61
    • jel: jel:D11 | jel:A13 | jel:H41 | jel:D62 | jel:D61 | jel:Q21
      ddc: ddc:330

In addition to his role as a consumer pursuing his own interests, an individual may also regard himself as an ethical observer, judging matters from society's point of view. It is not clear which of these possibly conflicting roles respondents in contingent valuation st... View more
  • References (37)
    37 references, page 1 of 4

    [1] Ajzen, I., T. C. Brown, and L. H. Rosenthal (1996): Information Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies: Effects of Personal Relevance, Quality of Information, and Motivations]. Orientation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 43-57.

    [2] Arrow, K. J. (1951): Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Commission Monograph no.12, New York: Wiley.

    [3] Arrow, K., R. Solow, E. Learner, P. Portney, R. Radner, and H. Schuman (1993): Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Federal Register/Vol. 58, no.10, 4602-4614.

    [4] Boyce, R. R., T. C. Brown, G. H. McClelland, G. L. Peterson, and W. D. Schultze (1992): An Experimental Examination of Intrinsic Values as a Source of the WTAWTP disparity, The American Economic Review 82, 1366-1373.

    [5] Brekke, K. A., H. Lulls and K. Nyborg (1994): Sufficient Welfare Indicators: Allowing Disagreement in Evalautions of Social Welfare, Discussion Paper 119, Statistics Norway.

    [6] Clark, J. and J. Burgess (1996): "Asking Questions about Answering Questions: A Case Study of Public Understanding of a Contingent Valuation Survey", in P. Lowe (ed.): Environmental Valuation and Public Policy, CAB International (forthcoming).

    [7] Desvouges, W. H., F. R. Johnson, R. W. Dunford, S. P. Hudson, K. N. Wilson (1993): "Measuring Natural Resource Damages With Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability", in Hausman, J. A. (ed.): Contingent Valuation. A Critical Assessment, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 91-164.

    [8] Diamond, P. A., and J. A. Hausman (1994): Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 45-64.

    [9] Freeman, A. M. (1993): The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Theory and Methods, Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    [10] Hammond, P. J. (1994): "Money Metric Measures of Individual and Social Welfare Allowing for Environmental Externalities", in W. Eichhorn (ed.): Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality, Springer-Verlag, 694-724.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark