Consistency and communication in committees

Research, Article, Preprint English OPEN
Inga Deimen; Felix Ketelaar; Mark T. Le Quement;
  • Publisher: Bonn: University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE)
  • Identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2015.08.004
  • Subject: Communication, Committees, Voting | Committees | Voting | Communication | D72 | D83 | D82
    • ddc: ddc:330
      jel: jel:D72 | jel:D83 | jel:D82

This paper analyzes truthtelling incentives in pre-vote communication in heterogeneous committees. We generalize the classical Condorcet jury model by introducing a new informational structure that captures consistency of information. In contrast to the impossibility re... View more
  • References (5)

    [16] M. T. Le Quement and V. Yokeeswaran, “Deliberation, conflict and unanimity.” mimeo, University of Bonn, 2012.

    [17] B. Manin, “On legitimacy and political deliberation,” Political theory, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 338-368, 1987.

    [18] A. Meirowitz, “In defense of exclusionary deliberation: Communication and voting with private beliefs and values,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 19, pp. 329-360, 2007.

    [19] R. Van Weelden, “Deliberation rules and voting,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, vol. 3, pp. 83-88, 2008.

    [20] A. Wolinsky, “Eliciting information from multiple experts,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 141-160, 2002.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark