Many empirical studies have discovered large discrepancies between willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) measures. This paper revisits the WTP and WTA divergence issue using a non-hypothetical market experiment, actual products, cash, and exchange in ... View more
Cameron, T.A. and J. Quiggin (1991). “Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up Questionnaire”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 218-234.
Cooper, J.C. (1993). “Optimal Bid Selection for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24, 25- 40.
Cooper, J.C. and W.M. Hanemann (1995). “Referendum Contingent Valuation: How Many Bounds are Enough?” USDA Economic Research Service, Food and Consumer Economics Division Working Paper, May.
Diamond, P.A. and J.A. Hausman (1994) “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 45-64.
Hanemann, W.M. (1991). “Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?”, American Economic Review 81, 635-47.
Hanemann, W.M. and B. Kanninen (1996). “The Statistical Analysis of DiscreteResponse CV Data.” Working paper no. 798, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics.
Hanemann, W.M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen (1991). “Statistical Efficiency of DoubleBounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 1255-63.
Horowitz, J.K. and K.E. McConnell (2002). “A Review of WTA/WTP Studies”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44, 426-47.
Horowitz, J.K., and K.E. McConnell (2003) “Willingness to Accept, Willingness to Pay and the Income Effect”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51, 537- 45.
Isik, M. (2004) “Does Uncertainty Affect the Divergence between WTP and WTA Measures?” Economics Bulletin, 4,1,1-7.