International health research monitoring: exploring a scientific and a cooperative approach using participatory action research

Article English OPEN
Chantler, Tracey ; Cheah, Phaik Yeong ; Miiro, George ; Hantrakum, Viriya ; Nanvubya, Annet ; Ayuo, Elizabeth ; Kivaya, Esther ; Kidola, Jeremiah ; Kaleebu, Pontiano ; Parker, Michael ; Njuguna, Patricia ; Ashley, Elizabeth ; Guerin, Philippe J ; Lang, Trudie (2014)
  • Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
  • Journal: BMJ Open, volume 4, issue 2 (eissn: 2044-6055)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004104, pmc: PMC3927800
  • Subject: Research Methods | 1699 | 1730 | Medical Ethics | 1693 | Qualitative Research | Tropical Medicine | 1506 | Statistics & Research Methods | Research | 1725

Objectives To evaluate and determine the value of monitoring models developed by the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Research Unit and the East African Consortium for Clinical Research, consider how this can be measured and explore monitors’ and investigators’ experiences of and views about the nature, purpose and practice of monitoring. Research design A case study approach was used within the context of participatory action research because one of the aims was to guide and improve practice. 34 interviews, five focus groups and observations of monitoring practice were conducted. Setting and participants Fieldwork occurred in the places where the monitoring models are coordinated and applied in Thailand, Cambodia, Uganda and Kenya. Participants included those coordinating the monitoring schemes, monitors, senior investigators and research staff. Analysis Transcribed textual data from field notes, interviews and focus groups was imported into a qualitative data software program (NVIVO V. 10) and analysed inductively and thematically by a qualitative researcher. The initial coding framework was reviewed internally and two main categories emerged from the subsequent interrogation of the data. Results The categories that were identified related to the conceptual framing and nature of monitoring, and the practice of monitoring, including relational factors. Particular emphasis was given to the value of a scientific and cooperative style of monitoring as a means of enhancing data quality, trust and transparency. In terms of practice the primary purpose of monitoring was defined as improving the conduct of health research and increasing the capacity of researchers and trial sites. Conclusions The models studied utilise internal and network wide expertise to improve the ethics and quality of clinical research. They demonstrate how monitoring can be a scientific and constructive exercise rather than a threatening process. The value of cooperative relations needs to be given more emphasis in monitoring activities, which seek to ensure that research protects human rights and produces reliable data.
  • References (36)
    36 references, page 1 of 4

    e 1. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of

    Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Guideline for Good vClinical Practice E6(R1). 1996.

    ep4/E6_R1__Guideline.pdfInternational (accessed 21st Septemiber 2011). 2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Regulations Relating to Good eClinical Practice and Clinical

    Trials. 2012. -

    FDARegulations. 3. European Medicines Agency. Regulatory and procedural guidance index. 2012.

    _000316.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac05800a4902. o

    Clin Trials 2008;5(1):38-39 doi: 10.1177/1740774507088099. n 4. Yusuf S, Bosch J, Devereaux PJ, et al. Sensible guidelines for the conduct of large randomized trials.

    Regulations. PLoS Med 2009;6(11):e1000131. l 5. McMahon AD, Conway DI, MacDonald TM, et al. The Unintended Consequences of Clinical Trials 6. Eisenstein EL, Collins R, Cracknell BS, et al. Sensible approaches for reducing clinical trial costs. Cylin

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    LSHTM Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 8
Share - Bookmark