Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks?

Article English OPEN
Jeroen Johan de Hartog ; Hanna Boogaard ; Hans Nijland ; Gerard Hoek
  • Publisher: Associação Brasileira de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva
  • Journal: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, volume 118, issue 8, pages 1,109-1,116 (issn: 1678-4561, eissn: 1552-9924)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901747, pmc: PMC2920084
  • Subject: Poluição do ar | Modal shift | Traffic accidents | Atividade física | Biking | cycling | life table analysis | Physical activity | RA1-1270 | Bicicleta | Public aspects of medicine | Review | Acidentes de trânsito | Air pollution | Mudança

BACKGROUND: Although from a societal point of view a modal shift from car to bicycle may have beneficial health effects due to decreased air pollution emissions, decreased greenhouse gas emissions, and increased levels of physical activity, shifts in individual adverse health effects such as higher exposure to air pollution and risk of a traffic accident may prevail.Objective: We describe whether the health benefits from the increased physical activity of a modal shift for urban commutes outweigh the health risks. DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: We have summarized the literature for air pollution, traffic accidents, and physical activity using systematic reviews supplemented with recent key studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: We quantified the impact on all-cause mortality when 500,000 people would make a transition from car to bicycle for short trips on a daily basis in the Netherlands. We have expressed mortality impacts in life-years gained or lost, using life table calculations. For individuals who shift from car to bicycle, we estimated that beneficial effects of increased physical activity are substantially larger (3-14 months gained) than the potential mortality effect of increased inhaled air pollution doses (0.8-40 days lost) and the increase in traffic accidents (5-9 days lost). Societal benefits are even larger because of a modest reduction in air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions and traffic accidents. CONCLUSIONS: On average, the estimated health benefits of cycling were substantially larger than the risks relative to car driving for individuals shifting their mode of transport.
  • References (77)
    77 references, page 1 of 8

    Adams HS, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Colvile RN, McMullen MAS, Khandelwal P. 2001. Fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK.

    Sci Total Environ 279:29-44.

    Adams HS, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Colvile RN, Older MJ, Kendall M. 2002. Assessment of road users' elemental carbon personal exposure levels, London, UK. Atmos Environ 36:5335-5342.

    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. 2000. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S498-504.

    Andersen LB, Schnohr P, Schroll M, Hein HO. 2000. All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work. Arch Intern Med 160:1621-1628.

    Bauman AE. 2004. Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000-2003.

    J Sci Med Sport 7:6-19.

    Beckx C, Arentze T, Int Panis L, Janssens D, Vankerkom J, Wets G. 2009a. An integrated activity-based modelling framework to assess vehicle emissions: approach and application. Environ Plann B Plann Des 36:1086-1102.

    Beckx C, Int Panis L, Arentze T, Janssens D, Wets G. 2009b.

    Disaggregation of nation-wide dynamic population exposure estimates in the Netherlands: applications of activitybased transport models. Atmos Environ 43:5454-5462.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available