Property Rights and Natural Resource Conservation: A Bio-Economic Model with Numerical Illustrations from the Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem

Report, Preprint, Other literature type English OPEN
Johannesen, Anne B. ; Skonhoft, Anders (2003)
  • Publisher: Institutt for samfunns√łkonomi
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1023/B:EARE.0000036774.15204.49
  • Subject: bio-economics; wildlife; property rights; Serengeti | Biodiversity | Modeling | Ecosystem | Environmental impacts | Resource management tools | Sustainability | Serengeti | Humid zones | Conservation | Ecosystem management | Property rights | Tropical zones | Habitat destruction | Bio-economics | Natural resource management | Wildlife | Ecosystem Farm/Enterprise Scale Field Scale Governance
    • jel: jel:Q28 | jel:Q21

This study develops a model for wildlife emigrating seasonally between a conservation area and a neighboring area. When being outside the conservation area, harvesting takes place by a group of small-scale farmers. The local people have two motives for harvesting; to get rid of ``problem'' animals as roaming wildlife destroys crops and agricultural products, and hunting for meat and trophies. Depending on the specification of the property rights, the harvesting is legal or illegal. It is demonstrated that it is far from clear which of the two property rights regimes that gives the highest wildlife abundance. Hence, contrary to what is argued for in the literature, handing the property rights over to the local people means not automatically more wildlife and a more ``sustainable'' resource utilization. The reason lies in the nuisance motive for harvesting. The exploitation under the two different property rights regimes are illustrated by numerical calculations with data that fits reasonably well with the exploitation of the wildebeest population in the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem.
  • References (25)
    25 references, page 1 of 3

    Barrett, C.B. and P. Arcese (1998): ''Wildlife harvest in integrated conservation and development projects'', Land Economics, 74(4), 449-465.

    Bromley, D. (1991): Environment and Economy, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Bulte, E. and G. van Kooten (1999): ''The ivory trade ban and elephant numbers: Theory and application to Zambia'', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(4), 453-466.

    Campbell, K. and H. Hofer (1995): ''People and wildlife: Spatial dynamics and zones of interaction''. In Sinclair, A.R.E. and P. Arcese: Serengeti II, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 534-570.

    Clark, C.W. (1990): Mathematical Bioeconomics (2th. edition, Wiley, New York.

    Caughley, G. and A. Sinclair(1994): Wildlife Ecology and Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Emerton, L. and I. Mfunda (1999): ''Making wildlife economically viable for communities living around the western Serengeti, Tanzania'', Evaluating Eden Series Discussion Paper, No. 1, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.

    Fancy, S., K. Whitten and D. Russel (1994): ''Demography of the porcupine caribou herd'', Canadian Journal of Zoology, 72(5), 840-846.

    Fryxell, J.M. (1995): ''Aggregation an migration by grazing ungulates in relation to resources and predators''. In Sinclair, A.R.E. and P. Arcese (eds): Serengeti II, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 257-273.

    Gordon, H.S. (1954): ''The economic theory of a common property resource: The fishery'', The Journal of Political Economy, 62, 124-142.

  • Similar Research Results (3)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark