Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

Article English OPEN
Amgoud , Leila; Vesic , Srdjan;
  • Publisher: Elsevier
  • Journal: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (issn: 0888-613X)
  • Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.010
  • Subject: Preferences | Intelligence artificielle | Argumentation | [INFO.INFO-AI]Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI] | [ INFO.INFO-LG ] Computer Science [cs]/Machine Learning [cs.LG] | [ INFO.INFO-CL ] Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL] | Logique en informatique | [INFO.INFO-CL]Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL] | [ INFO.INFO-LO ] Computer Science [cs]/Logic in Computer Science [cs.LO] | [INFO.INFO-LO]Computer Science [cs]/Logic in Computer Science [cs.LO] | Informatique et langage | Handling Inconsistency | [ INFO.INFO-AI ] Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI] | Apprentissage | [INFO.INFO-LG]Computer Science [cs]/Machine Learning [cs.LG]

International audience; An argumentation framework is seen as a directed graph whose nodes are arguments and arcs are attacks between the arguments. Acceptable sets of arguments, called extensions, are computed using a semantics. Existing semantics are solely based on t... View more
  • References (5)

    [1] L. Amgoud, S. Vesic, Handling inconsistency with preference-based argumentation, in: A. Deshpande, A. Hunter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM'10, Springer, 2010, pp. 56-69.

    [2] L. Amgoud, S. Vesic, On the role of preferences in argumentation frameworks, in: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Tools in AI, ICTAI'10, IEEE, 2010, pp. 219-222.

    [3] L. Amgoud, S. Vesic, Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks, in: W. Liu (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, ECSQARU'11, Springer, 2011, pp. 86-97.

    [4] P. Besnard, A. Hunter, A logic-based theory of deductive arguments, Artif. Intell. 128 (2001) 203-235.

    [5] A. García, G. Simari, Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach, Theory Pract. Log. Program. 4 (1) (2004) 95-138.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark