publication . Article . 2016

Differential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information: The case of validity of groups’ decisions

Jorge Vala; Diniz Lopes; Dominique Oberlé;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Sep 2016
  • Publisher: SAGE Publications
Abstract
WOS:000406602300006 (Nº de Acesso Web of Science) In this article, we analyse the moderating effect of the activation of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of heterogeneity and consensus information in the attribution of validity to group decisions. In two experimental studies, we present evidence showing that the participants, when primed with an interdependent view of the self, make no distinction between homogeneous or heterogeneous information regarding group composition while attributing validity to group decisions. Indeed, they base their validity attribution mainly on consensus information. In contrast, when primed with an indepen...
Subjects
free text keywords: Consensus information, Heterogeneity information, Interdependence, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, Independence, Validation of group decisions, Psychology, Attribution, Group composition, Self, Differential impact, Heterogeneous information, Homogeneous, Social psychology, media_common.quotation_subject, media_common
Funded by
FCT| UID/PSI/03125/2013
Project
UID/PSI/03125/2013
Center for Research and Social Intervention
  • Funder: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT)
  • Project Code: 147229
  • Funding stream: 5876
,
FCT| PTDC/PSI-PSO/115096/2009
Project
PTDC/PSI-PSO/115096/2009
Perceived heterogeneity and validation of everyday knowledge: When group members evaluate the validity of their own production
  • Funder: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT)
  • Project Code: 115096
  • Funding stream: 3599-PPCDT
55 references, page 1 of 4

Aaker J, Lee AY (2001) 'I' seek pleasures and 'we' avoid pains: The role of self- regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 28: 33-49.

Aaker JL, Maheswaran D (1997) The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion. The Journal of Consumer Research 24: 315-328. [OpenAIRE]

Asch S (1952) Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Augustinova M, Drozda-Senkowska E, Lasticova B (2004) La confiance dans les décisions collectives: Une question de garanties [Confidence in collective decisions: A question of guarantees]. Année Psychologique 104: 649-681.

Badea C, Brauer M, Rubin M (2012) The effects of winning and losing on perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48: 1094-1099.

Batel S, Castro P (2009) A social representations approach to the communication between different spheres: An analysis of the impacts of two discursive formats. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 39: 415-433. [OpenAIRE]

Bechtoldt MN, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA, Choi HS (2010) Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99: 622- 637.

Berkowitz L (1957) Effects of perceived dependency relationships upon conformity to group expectations. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 55: 350-354.

Bohner G, Dykema-Engblade A, Tindale RS, Meisenhelder H (2008) Framing of minority and majority source information in persuasion: When and how 'consensus implies correctness'. Social Psychology 39: 108-116. [OpenAIRE]

Bond R, Smith PB (1996) Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin 119: 111-137.

Brewer M, Gardner W (1996) Who is this 'we'? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 83-93.

Chambres P, Bonin D, Izaute M, Marescaux PJ (2002) Metacognition triggered by a social aspect of expertise. In: Chambres P, Izaute M, Marescaux PJ (eds) Metacognition: Process, Function and Use. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 153-168.

Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 591-621. [OpenAIRE]

Cross SE, Hardin E, Gercek-Swing B (2011) The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review 15: 142-179.

Darke PR, Chaiken S, Bohner G, Einwiller S, Erb H-P, Hazlewood JD (1998) Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: Effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 1205-1215.

55 references, page 1 of 4
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue