Collectively exploring the potential of technology derived from university research: the NanoMem case

Preprint English OPEN
Boldrini , Jean-Claude; Schieb-Bienfait , Nathalie;
(2015)
  • Publisher: HAL CCSD
  • Subject: JEL: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D | JEL : O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D | Exploration | exploratory project | JEL: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives | upstream innovation project phases. | [ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances | [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration | Exploration, exploratory project, collaborative project, upstream innovation project phases. | [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances | collaborative project | JEL : O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives | [ SHS.GESTION ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration

The value creation of research activities is a fully fledged mission at university. This article examines the various issues arising from this requirement and the nature of the organizational mechanisms likely to be implemented to meet it. It describes the NanoMem case ... View more
  • References (25)
    25 references, page 1 of 3

    Anderson, T. R., Daim, T. U., Lavoie, F. F., 2007. Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation 27 (5), 306-318.

    Asheim, B., 2007. Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation 20 (3), 223-241.

    Barringer, B.R., Harrison, J.S., 2000. Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value Through Interorganizational Relationships. Journal of Management 26 (3), 367-403.

    Bonaccorsi, A., 2008. Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. Minerva 46 (3), 285-315.

    Bozeman, B., 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research policy 29 (4), 627-655.

    Bray, M.J., Lee, J.N., 2000. University revenues from Technology transfer: Licensing fees vs equity positions. Journal of Business Venturing 15 (5-6), 385-392.

    Bréchet, J.-P., Emin, S., Schieb-Bienfait, N., 2014. La recherche-accompagnement : une pratique légitime. Finance Contrôle Stratégie 17 (2), 2-20.

    Bruneel, J., d'Este, P., Salter, A., 2010. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 39 (7), 858-868.

    Buzan, T., Buzan, B., 1993. The Mind Map Book. How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximise Your Brain's Untapped Potential, New York, Plume.

    Carayannis, E.G., Rogers, E.M., Kurihara, K., Allbriton, M.M., 1998. High-Technology spinoffs from government R-D Laboratories and research Universities. Technovation 18 (1), 1- 11.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark