A Field Experiment in Motivating Employee Ideas

Research, Preprint OPEN
Susanne Neckermann ; Michael Gibbs ; Christoph Siemroth (2014)
  • Publisher: Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam and Rotterdam
  • Subject: innovation | 330 Wirtschaft | field experiment | M52 | J24 | intrinsic motivation, creativity, innovation, incentives | O32 | incentives | intrinsic motivation | innovation, rewards, creativity, field experiment | C93 | creativity | rewards
    • jel: jel:C93 | jel:J24 | jel:M52 | jel:O32
      ddc: ddc:330
    acm: ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS

markdownabstract__Abstract__ We study the effects of a field experiment designed to motivate employee ideas, at a large technology company. Employees were encouraged to submit ideas on process and product improvements via an online system. In the experiment, the company randomized 19 account teams into treatment and control groups. Employees in treatment teams received rewards if their ideas were approved. Nothing changed for employees in control teams. Our main finding is that rewards substantially increased the quality of ideas submitted. Further, rewards increased participation in the suggestion system, but decreased the number of ideas per participating employee, with zero net effect on the total quantity of ideas. The broader participation base persisted even after the reward was discontinued, suggesting habituation. We find no evidence for motivational crowding out. Our findings suggest that rewards can improve innovation and creativity, and that there may be a tradeoff between the quantity and quality of ideas.
  • References (29)
    29 references, page 1 of 3

    Amabile, T. M. (1982). Children's Artistic Creativity Detrimental Effects of Competition in a Field Setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(3), 573-578.

    Ariely, D., Gneezy, U., Loewenstein, G., & Mazar, N. (2009). Large stakes and big mistakes. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(2), 451-469.

    Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., & Manso, G. (2011). Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences. The RAND Journal of Economics, 42(3), 527-554.

    Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. 2006. “Incentives and Prosocial behavior”. American Economic Review. N. 96, pp. 1652-1678.

    Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249-275.

    Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J., & Miller, D. (2008) "Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors", Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 90(3): 414-427.

    Charness, G., & Grieco, D. (2013). Individual creativity, ex-ante goals and financial incentives. Working Paper.

    Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105.

    Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668.

    Eckartz, K., Kirchkamp, O., & Schunk, D. (2012). How do incentives affect creativity? Working Paper.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark