The heritability of mating behaviour in a fly and its plasticity in response to the threat of sperm competition.

Article English OPEN
Amanda Bretman ; Anne Lizé ; Craig A Walling ; Tom A R Price
  • Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
  • Journal: PLoS ONE, volume 9, issue 2 (issn: 1932-6203, eissn: 1932-6203)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3934992, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090236
  • Subject: Animal Models | Research Article | Sexual Selection | Evolutionary Processes | DROSOPHILA-PSEUDOOBSCURA | Ecology | Evolutionary Biology | Sexual Behavior | WILD BIRD POPULATION | Evolutionary Ecology | BY-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS | Biology | Veterinary Science | Behavioral Ecology | Animal Behavior | PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY | Medicine | Q | R | Model Organisms | SELECTION | Entomology | Science | NATURAL-POPULATIONS | COPULATION DURATION | Animal Management | REACTION NORMS | SEX-RATIO POLYMORPHISM | Zoology | GENETIC-VARIATION
    mesheuropmc: reproductive and urinary physiology | fungi

<p>Phenotypic plasticity is a key mechanism by which animals can cope with rapidly changeable environments, but the evolutionary lability of such plasticity remains unclear. The socio-sexual environment can fluctuate very rapidly, affecting both the frequency of mating opportunities and the level of competition males may face. Males of many species show plastic behavioural responses to changes in social environment, in particular the presence of rival males. For example, Drosophila pseudoobscura males respond to rivals by extending mating duration and increasing ejaculate size. Whilst such responses are predicted to be adaptive, the extent to which the magnitude of response is heritable, and hence selectable, is unknown. We investigated this using isofemale lines of the fruit fly D. pseudoobscura, estimating heritability of mating duration in males exposed or not to a rival, and any genetic basis to the change in this trait between these environments (i.e. degree of plasticity). The two populations differed in population sex ratio, and the presence of a sex ratio distorting selfish chromosome. We find that mating duration is heritable, but no evidence of population differences. We find no significant heritability of plasticity in mating duration in one population, but borderline significant heritability of plasticity in the second. This difference between populations might be related to the presence of the sex ratio distorting selfish gene in the latter population, but this will require investigation in additional populations to draw any conclusions. We suggest that there is scope for selection to produce an evolutionary response in the plasticity of mating duration in response to rivals in D. pseudoobscura, at least in some populations.</p>
  • References (65)
    65 references, page 1 of 7

    1. West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    2. Scheiner SM (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Ann Rev Ecol & Syst 24: 35-68.

    3. Parker GA (1982) Phenotype-limited evolutionary stable strategies. In: King's College Sociobiology Group C, editor. Current Problems in Sociobiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173-201.

    4. Ghalambor CK, Angeloni LM, Carroll SP (2010) Behavior as phenotypic plasticity. In: Westneat DF, Fox CW, editors. Evol Behav Ecol: OUP. 90-107.

    5. Hendry AP, Farrugia TJ, Kinnison MT (2008) Human influences on the rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations. Mol Ecol 17: 20-29.

    6. Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong D, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, et al. (1995) Adaptive plasticity, consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecol & Evol 10: 212- 217.

    7. Dingemanse NJ, Kazem AJN, Re´ale D, Wright J (2009) Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends in Ecol & Evol 25: 81-89.

    8. Pigliucci M (2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology and EvolutionEcol & Evol 20: 481-486.

    9. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev of the Cambridge Phil Soc 45: 525-567.

    10. Kasumovic MM, Bruce MJ, Andrade MCB, Herberstein ME (2008) Spatial and temporal demographic variation drives within-season fluctutations in sexual selection. Evolution 62: 2316-2325.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 15