publication . Article . 2015

Reflections on ten years of using economics games and experiments in teaching

Guest, J;
Open Access English
  • Published: 26 Nov 2015 Journal: Cogent Economics & Finance (issn: 2332-2039, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group
In this paper, the author reflects on his 10 years’ experience of using games and experiments and in the process develops a type of practitioner’s guide. The existing quantitative and qualitative evidence on the impact of using games on student learning is reviewed. On balance, a positive effect, on measures of attainment, is found in the literature. Given these findings, it is surprising that there is also evidence in the UK and US that they are not widely used. Some factors are discussed that might deter tutors from employing them. Unsurprisingly, one of these is the additional cost, which might make the use of online games seem more attractive, given the way ...
free text keywords: active learning, economic games and experiments, public good games, HG1-9999, economic tools for teaching, learning by doing, HB1-3840, voluntary contribution mechanism, Finance, online vs. paper-based games, Economic theory. Demography, ddc:330
30 references, page 1 of 2

Anderson, L., & Holt, C. (1996). Classroom games: Information cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 187-193.

Balkenborg, D., & Kaplin, T. (2009). Economics classroom experiments. Retrieved from Economics Network: http:// (handbook chapter). [OpenAIRE]

Ball, S., Eckel, C., & Rojas, C. (2006). Technology improves learning in large principles of economics classes: Using our WITS. American Economic Review, 96, 442-446. [OpenAIRE]

Ball, S., & Holt, C. (1998). Classroom games: Speculation and bubbles in an asset market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 207-218.

Becker, W. (2001). What does the quantitative research literature really show about teaching? (Unpublished paper). Bloomington: Indiana University.

Brandts, J., & Schram, A. (2001). Cooperation and noise in public goods experiments: Applying the contribution function approach. Journal of Public Economics, 79, 399-427. [OpenAIRE]

Cardell, S., Fort, R., Joerding, W., Inaba, F., Lamoreaux, D., Rosenman, R., … Bartlett, R. (1996). Laboratory-based experimental and demonstration initiatives in teaching undergraduate economics. The American Economic Review, 86, 454-459. [OpenAIRE]

Carter, L., & Emerson, T. (2012). In-class vs. online experiments: Is there a diefrence? The Journal of Economic Education, 43, 4-18.

Dickie, M. (2006). Do classroom experiments increase learning in introductory microeconomics? The Journal of Economic Education, 37, 267-288.

Durham, Y., Mckinnon, T., & Schulman, C. (2007). Classroom experiments: Not just fun and games. Economic Inquiry, 45, 162-178.

Emerson, T., & Taylor, B. (2004). Comparing student achievement across experimental and lecture-oriented sections of a principles of microeconomics course. Southern Economic Journal, 70, 672-693.

Frank, R. (2006). The economic naturalist writing assignment. The Journal of Economic Education, 37, 58-67.

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. London: Further Education Unit.

Goeree, J., & Holt, C. (1999). Employment and prices in a simple macroeconomy. Southern Economic Journal, 65, 637-647.

Goef, W., & Kauper, D. (2014). A survey of principles instructors: Why lecture prevails. The Journal of Economic Education, 45, 360-375.

30 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue
publication . Article . 2015

Reflections on ten years of using economics games and experiments in teaching

Guest, J;