Addiction and network influence

Research, Preprint English OPEN
Michal Ksawery Popiel;
(2014)
  • Publisher: Kingston (Ontario): Queen's University, Department of Economics
  • Subject: dual-self | D01 | addiction | networks | addiction, dual-self, networks, random utility | I18 | random utility | C70
    • jel: jel:D01 | jel:C70 | jel:I18
      ddc: ddc:330
    mesheuropmc: food and beverages

Social networks are an important component in understanding the decision to consume addictive substances. They capture the role of limited access, peer influence, and social acceptance and tolerance. However, despite the empirical evidence of their role, they have been ... View more
  • References (15)
    15 references, page 1 of 2

    Becker, G. S. and Murphy, K. M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4):675{700.

    Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A. (2004). Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review, 94(5):1558{1590.

    Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A. (2005). Behavioral public economics: Welfare and policy analysis with non-standard decision-makers. Discussion Papers 04-033, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

    Gardner, M. and Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer in uence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4):625{635.

    Hawkins, J. D. and Fraser, M. W. (1987). The social networks of drug abusers before and after treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 22(4):343{355.

    Jackson, M. O. and Yariv, L. (2007). Diffusion of behavior and equilibrium properties in network games. The American Economic Review, 97(2):92{98.

    Koob, G. F. and Moal, M. L. (2006). Neurobiology of Addiction. Academic Press.

    Loewenstein, G. and O'Donoghue, T. (2004). Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior. Working Papers 04-14, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.

    Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., and Rabin, M. (2003). Projection bias in predicting future utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4):1209{1248.

    Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer in uence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4):267{277.

  • Related Organizations (2)
  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark