publication . Conference object . 2008

To Authenticate Opinion and (Re-)draw the boundaries of the Public Sphere

Jørgensen, Signe Kjær;
Open Access English
  • Published: 13 May 2008
  • Publisher: HAL CCSD
Abstract
The text aims to explore the explanatory potential of the concept of authenticity to identify successful introductions of topics previously considered as controversial in the Danish public sphere from 2005 and onwards. The theoretical point of departure is the rhetorical assumption that the individual is culturally and socially engaged and intends to persuade her audience to adopt or at least percieve as legitimate her ideas and proposals as she articulates them. This rhetorical assumption is complemented by a combined discourse theoretical and critical discourse analytical methodology. The central concepts of hegemony and struggles of meaning are adopted from d...
Subjects
free text keywords: Religious claims, public sphere, Denmark, legitimacy, critical linguistics, religion, authenticity, Charles Taylor, Ruth Wodak, Norman Fairclough, Lilie Chouliaraki, [SHS.RELIG]Humanities and Social Sciences/Religions, [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics
39 references, page 1 of 3

Bang, Henrik & Esmark, Anders (2007): New Publics with/ out Democracy. Frederiksberg. Nordicom/ Samfundslitteratur.

Calhoun, Craig (1992): Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

Casanova, Jose (1994): Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

Chouliaraki, Lilie (2000): “Reflexivity and Late Modern Identity” (pp 305-330). In Reisigl & Wodak (eds): The Semiotics of Racism. Vienna. Passagen Verlag.

Chouliaraki, Lilie (2004): “Watching September 11th: The Politics of Pity” (pp. 185-198). Discourse & Society vol 15 no 2-3. [OpenAIRE]

Crone, Manni & Manniche, Vibeke (2006): Maskeret tvang. Forlaget Liva.

Crossley, Nick & Roberts, J. M. (2004): After Habermas. Oxford. Blackwell Publishing.

van Dijk, T. A. (2005): “Contextual Knowledge Management in Discourse Production” (pp 71-100). In Wodak & Chilton (eds.): A New Agenda in Critical Discourse Analysis. Benjamins pbls.

Fairclough, Norman (1992): Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press & Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Fairclough, Norman (2003): Analysing Discouse. London. Routledge.

Ferrara A. (2004): “The Relation of Authenticity to Normativity: A Response to Larmore and Honneth” (pp 17-24). Philosophy and Social Criticism. vol. 30 no. 1.

Fraser, Nancy (2007): “Transnationalizing the Public Sphere” (pp 7-30). Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 24 no. 4.

Giddens, Anthony (1994): “Living in a Post-traditional Society” (pp 56-109). In Beck, Giddens & Lash: Reflexive Modernisation. Cambridge Polity Press.

Giddens, Anthony (1996): Modernity and Self Identity. Cambridge. Polity Press.

Goodnight, G. Thomas (1992): “Habermas, The Public Sphere and Controversy” (pp. 243-255), I International Journal of Public Opinion Research no 4.

39 references, page 1 of 3
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue