Developing the Chinese version of the new 5-level EQ-5D descriptive system: the response scaling approach

Article English OPEN
Luo, Nan; Li, Minghui; Liu, Gordon G.; Lloyd, Andrew; de Charro, Frank; Herdman, Michael;

Purpose To develop a Chinese version of the new, 5-level EQ-5D descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) from the existing EQ-5D-3L by identifying Chinese label wording suitable for constructing EQ-5D-5L’s 5-point response scales. Methods In face-to-face interviews, perceived sever... View more
  • References (19)
    19 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Wang, H., Kindig, D. A., & Mullahy, J. (2005). Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: results from a EuroQol study in Beijing, China. Quality of Life Research, 14(1), 119-132.

    2. Luo, N., Johnson, J. A., Shaw, J. W., Feeny, D., & Coons, S. J. (2005). Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Medical Care, 43(11), 1078-1086.

    3. Bharmal, M., & Thomas, J., 3rd. (2006). Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value Health, 9(4), 262-271. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00108.x.

    4. Perneger, T. V., Combescure, C., & Courvoisier, D. S. (2010). General population reference values for the French version of the EuroQol EQ-5D health utility instrument. Value Health, 13(5), 631-635. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00727.x.

    5. Moock, J., & Kohlmann, T. (2008). Comparing preference-based quality-of-life measures: results from rehabilitation patients with musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or psychosomatic disorders. Quality of Life Research, 17(3), 485-495. doi:10.1007/s11136- 008-9317-6.

    6. Staerkle, R. F., & Villiger, P. (2011). Simple questionnaire for assessing core outcomes in inguinal hernia repair. British Journal of Surgery, 98(1), 148-155. doi:10.1002/bjs.7236.

    7. Vainiola, T., Pettila, V., Roine, R. P., Rasanen, P., Rissanen, A. M., & Sintonen, H. (2010). Comparison of two utility instruments, the EQ-5D and the 15D, in the critical care setting. Intensive Care Medicine, 36(12), 2090-2093. doi:10.1007/ s00134-010-1979-1.

    8. Brazier, J., Jones, N., & Kind, P. (1993). Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 2(3), 169-180.

    9. Marra, C. A., Rashidi, A. A., Guh, D., Kopec, J. A., Abrahamowicz, M., Esdaile, J. M., et al. (2005). Are indirect utility measures reliable and responsive in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1333-1344.

    10. Harrison, M. J., Davies, L. M., Bansback, N. J., McCoy, M. J., Verstappen, S. M., Watson, K., et al. (2009). The comparative responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1195-1205. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9539-2.

  • Related Organizations (5)
  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark