Predictability of the individual clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for cellulite

Article English OPEN
Schmitz, Christoph ; Schlaudraff,Kai-Uwe ; Kiessling,Maren ; Csaszar,Nikolaus (2014)
  • Publisher: Dove Press
  • Journal: Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, volume 7, pages 171-183 (issn: 1178-7015, eissn: 1178-7015)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC4043818, doi: 10.2147/CCID.S59851
  • Subject: EPAT | acoustic wave therapy | extracorporeal pulse activation therapy | Dermatology | Original Research | RSWT | Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology | radial shock wave therapy | RL1-803 | AWT

Kai-Uwe Schlaudraff,1 Maren C Kiessling,2 Nikolaus BM Császár,2 Christoph Schmitz21Concept Clinic, Geneva, Switzerland; 2Department of Anatomy II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, GermanyBackground: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy has been successfully introduced for the treatment of cellulite in recent years. However, it is still unknown whether the individual clinical outcome of cellulite treatment with extracorporeal shock wave therapy can be predicted by the patient's individual cellulite grade at baseline, individual patient age, body mass index (BMI), weight, and/or height.Methods: Fourteen Caucasian females with cellulite were enrolled in a prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label Phase II study. The mean (± standard error of the mean) cellulite grade at baseline was 2.5±0.09 and mean BMI was 22.8±1.17. All patients were treated with radial extracorporeal shock waves using the Swiss DolorClast® device (Electro Medical Systems, S.A., Nyon, Switzerland). Patients were treated unilaterally with 2 weekly treatments for 4 weeks on a randomly selected side (left or right), totaling eight treatments on the selected side. Treatment was performed at 3.5–4.0 bar, with 15,000 impulses per session applied at 15 Hz. Impulses were homogeneously distributed over the posterior thigh and buttock area (resulting in 7,500 impulses per area). Treatment success was evaluated after the last treatment and 4 weeks later by clinical examination, photographic documentation, contact thermography, and patient satisfaction questionnaires.Results: The mean cellulite grade improved from 2.5±0.09 at baseline to 1.57±0.18 after the last treatment (ie, mean δ-1 was 0.93 cellulite grades) and 1.68±0.16 at follow-up (ie, mean δ-2 was 0.82 cellulite grades). Compared with baseline, no patient's condition worsened, the treatment was well tolerated, and no unwanted side effects were observed. No statistically significant (ie, P<0.05) correlation was found between individual values for δ-1 and δ-2 and cellulite grade at baseline, BMI, weight, height, or age.Conclusion: Radial shock wave therapy is a safe and effective treatment option for cellulite. The individual clinical outcome cannot be predicted by the patient's individual cellulite grade at baseline, BMI, weight, height, or age.Keywords: acoustic wave therapy, AWT, extracorporeal pulse activation therapy, EPAT, radial shock wave therapy, RSWT
  • References (76)
    76 references, page 1 of 8

    1. Rossi AB, Vergnanini AL. Cellulite: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14:251-262.

    2. Avram MM. Cellulite: a review of its physiology and treatment. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004;6:181-185.

    3. Khan MH, Victor F, Rao B, Sadick NS. Treatment of cellulite: Part I. Pathophysiology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:361-370.

    4. de la Casa Almeida M, Suarez Serrano C, Rebollo Roldán J, Jiménez Rejano JJ. Cellulite's aetiology: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:273-278.

    5. Emanuele E, Bertona M, Geroldi D. A multilocus candidate approach identifies ACE and HIF1A as susceptibility genes for cellulite. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:930-935.

    6. Stavroulaki A, Pramantiotis G. Cellulite, smoking and angiotensinconverting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion polymorphism. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:1116-1117.

    7. Nürnberger F, Müller G. So-called cellulite: an invented disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1978;4:221-229.

    8. Rosenbaum M, Prieto V, Hellmer J, et al. An exploratory investigation of the morphology and biochemistry of cellulite. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1934-1939.

    9. Smalls LK, Lee CY, Whitestone J, Kitzmiller WJ, Wickett RR, Visscher MO. Quantitative model of cellulite: three-dimensional skin surface topography, biophysical characterization, and relationship to human perception. J Cosmet Sci. 2005;56:105-120.

    10. Lotti T, Ghersetich I, Grappone C, Dini G. Proteoglycans in so-called cellulite. Int J Dermatol. 1990;29:272-274.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    7
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    0
    downloads in local repository
Share - Bookmark