Prioritization of Companion Animal Transmissible Diseases for Policy Intervention in Europe

Article English OPEN
Cito, F. ; Rijks, J. ; Rantsios, A. T. ; Cunningham, A. A. ; Baneth, G. ; Guardabassi, L. ; Kuiken, T. ; Giovannini, A. (2016)
  • Publisher: Elsevier
  • Journal: Journal of Comparative Pathology, volume 155, issue 1, pages S18-S26 (issn: 0021-9975)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2015.01.007
  • Subject: Companion animal; prioritization; transmissible disease; zoonosis | veterinary(all) | Pathology and Forensic Medicine

A number of papers have been published on the prioritization of transmissible diseases in farm animals and wildlife, based either on semiquantitative or truly quantitative methods, but there is no published literature on the prioritization of transmissible diseases in companion animals. In this study, available epidemiological data for diseases transmissible from companion animals to man were analysed with the aim of developing a procedure suitable for their prioritization within a European framework. A new method and its associated questionnaire and scoring system were designed based on methods described by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Modifications were applied to allow for the paucity of specific information on companion animal transmissible diseases. The OIE method was also adapted to the subject and to the regional scope of the interprofessional network addressing zoonotic diseases transmitted via companion animals in Europe: the Companion Animals multisectoriaL interprofessionaL Interdisciplinary Strategic Think tank On zoonoses (CALLISTO). Adaptations were made based on information collected from expert groups on viral, bacterial and parasitic diseases using a structured questionnaire, in which all questions were closed-ended. The expert groups were asked to select the most appropriate answer for each question taking into account the relevance and reliability of the data available in the scientific literature. Subsequently, the scoring of the answers obtained for each disease covered by the questionnaire was analysed to obtain two final overall scores, one for human health impact and one for agricultural economic impact. The adapted method was then applied to select the 15 most important pathogens (five for each pathogen group: viral, bacterial and parasitic) on the basis of their overall impact on public health and agriculture. The result of the prioritization exercise was a joint priority list (available at www.callistoproject.eu) of relevant pathogens according to these two criteria. As the scope of CALLISTO was comprehensive in terms of geographical area, animal species involved and impact of the diseases, the list of prioritized diseases had to accommodate the realities in different European countries and the differences in biology and animal-human relationships in a wide range of species including cats and dogs, pet pigs and sheep as well as captive reptiles. The methodology presented in this paper can be used to generate accurate priority lists according to narrower and more specific objectives.
  • References (12)
    12 references, page 1 of 2

    Cardoen S, Van Huffel X, Berkvens D, Quoilin S, Ducoffre G et al. (2009) Evidence-based semiquantitative methodology for prioritization of foodborne zoonoses. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 6, 1083e1096.

    Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). (2009) ARCHIVE: Veterinary Surveillance: Prioritisation Project. Available at: http://archive. defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/ vetsurveillance/strategy/programme/prioritisation.htm Accessed on July 24th, 2014.

    European Pet Food Industry Federation (FEDIAF). (2012) Facts and Figures 2012. Available at: http://www. fediaf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Secretariat/facts_ and_figures_2012.pdf Accessed on July 24th, 2014.

    Eurostat (2014) Data downloaded from: http://appsso. eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do. Accessed on July 24th, 2014.

    Havelaar AH, van Rosse F, Bucura C, Toetenel MA, Haagsma JA et al. (2010) Prioritizing emerging zoonoses in The Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 5, e13965.

    Humblet MF, Vandeputte S, Albert A, Gosset C, Kirschvink N et al. (2012) Multidisciplinary and evidence-based method for prioritizing diseases of food-producing animals and zoonoses. Emerging Infectious Disease, 18. Online Report. Materials Available Online Only. Available at: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/ 18/4/11-1151_article.htm Accessed on 24th, July 2014.

    Krause G, the Working Group on Prioritization at the Robert Koch Institute (2008a) Prioritization of infectious diseases in public health e call for comments. Eurosurveillance, 13. October 2nd, 2008.

    Krause G, the Working Group on Prioritization at the Robert Koch Institute (2008b) How can infectious diseases be prioritized in public health? European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Reports, 9, s22es27.

    Kurowicka D, Bucura C, Cooke R, Havelaar A (2010) Probabilistic inversion in priority setting of emerging zoonoses. Risk Analysis, 30, 715e723.

    McKenzie J, Simpson H, Langstaff I (2007) Development of methodology to prioritise wildlife pathogens for surveillance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 81, 194e210.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    8
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    UCL Discovery - IRUS-UK 0 8
Share - Bookmark