Supporting medical students with learning disabilities in Asian medical schools

Article, Review English OPEN
Majumder, Azim ; Rahman,Sayeeda ; Dsouza,UJ ; Elbeheri ,Gad ; Bin Abdulrahman,Khalid ; Huq,Muzaherul (2010)
  • Publisher: Dove Press
  • Journal: Advances in Medical Education and Practice, volume 1, pages 31-39 (issn: 1179-7258, eissn: 1179-7258)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3643129, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S13253
  • Subject: Advances in Medical Education and Practice | medical education | Review | Asia | learning disabilities | dyslexia

Md. Anwarul Azim Majumder1, Sayeeda Rahman2, Urban JA D’Souza3, Gad Elbeheri4, Khalid Bin Abdulrahman5, M Muzaherul Huq61,2Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire, Bradford, UK; 3School of Medicine, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia; 4Centre for Child Evaluation and Teaching, Kuwait; 5College of Medicine, Al-Imam University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 6Centre for Medical Education (CME), Mohakhali, Dhaka, BangladeshAbstract: Learning disabilities (LDs) represent the largest group of disabilities in higher education (HE) institutes, including medical schools, and the numbers are continuing to rise. The worrying concern is that two-thirds to half of these students with LDs remain undiagnosed when they start their undergraduate education and may even graduate without having their disabilities diagnosed. These students struggle with their academic abilities, receive poor grades and, as a result, develop lower perceptions of their intellectual abilities than do those students without LDs. All these ultimately hamper their professional practice, employment, and career progression. Appropriate and adequate educational policies, provisions, and practices help students to progress satisfactorily. In Asian countries, public and professional awareness about LDs is low, supportive provisions are limited, legislations are inadequate, data are scarce, and equal-opportunity/widening-participation policies are not implemented effectively in the HE sector. This article discusses the issues related to LDs in medical education and draws policy, provision, and practice implications to identify, assess, and support students with LDs in medical schools, particularly in an Asian context.Keywords: medical education, learning disabilities, dyslexia, Asia
  • References (89)
    89 references, page 1 of 9

    1. Universities UK. Fair Enough: Wider Access to University by Identifying Potential to Succeed. London, UK: Universities UK; 2003.

    2. Universities Australia. Advancing Equity and Participation in Australian Higher Education: Action to address participation and equity levels in higher education of people from low socioeconomic backgrounds and Indigenous people. Canberra, Australia: Universities Australia; 2008.

    3. Beedham C, Diston A, Cottrell D, Drew C. Widening participation in medicine: the Bradford Leeds Partnership. Clin Teach. 2006;3: 158-162.

    4. Jamieson C, Morgan E. Managing Dyslexia at University. A Resource for Students, Academic and Support Staff. London, UK: Routledge; 2008.

    5. Reid G, Kirk J. Dyslexia in Adults: Education and Employment. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2001.

    6. Wolanin TR, Steele PE. Higher Education Opportunities for Students with Disabilities: Primer for Policy Makers. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy; 2004.

    7. Universities and Colleges Admissions Service. Statistical services: Breakdown of applicant and accepted applicant disability data over six years. Available from: http://www.ucas.com/about_us/stat_services/ stats_online/data_tables/disability. Accessed Jun 25, 2010.

    8. Rosebraugh CJ. Learning disabilities and medical schools. Med Educ. 2000;34:994-1000.

    9. Walters JA, Croen LG. An approach to meeting the needs of medical students with learning disabilities. Teach Learn Med. 1993;5:29-35.

    10. Richardson JTE, Wydell TN. The representation and attainment of students with dyslexia in UK higher education. Read Writ. 2003;16: 475-503.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark