Politics-Business Interaction Paths

Research, Preprint OPEN
Marianna Belloc ; Ugo Pagano (2009)
  • Publisher: Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo) Munich
  • Subject: J50 | Bayesian model estimation | G32 | ownership concentration | G34 | K22 | Bayesian model comparison | P10 | employment protection, corporate governance, ownership concentration, Bayesian model estimation, Bayesian model comparison | corporate governance | employment protection, corporate governance, ownership concentration, Bayesian model estimation, Bayesian model comparison. | employment protection
    • jel: jel:G34 | jel:G32 | jel:J50 | jel:K22 | jel:P10
      ddc: ddc:330

Most pre-crisis explanations of the various corporate governance systems have considered the separation between ownership and control to be an advantage of the Anglo-American economies. They have also attributed the failure of other countries to achieve these efficient arrangements to their different legal and/or electoral systems. In this paper we compare this view with the co-evolution approach based on the hypothesis that politics and corporate governance influence each other, generating complex interactions of financial and labour market institutions. Countries cluster along different complementary politics-business interaction paths and there is no reason to expect, or to device policies for, their convergence to a single model of corporate governance. We argue that this hypothesis provides a more convincing explanation of the past histories of major capitalist economies and can suggest some useful possible scenarios of their future institutional development. Bayesian model comparison suggests that the co-evolution approach turns out at least as influential as the competing theories in explaining shareholder and worker protection determination.
  • References (12)
    12 references, page 1 of 2

    2871 Annette Alstadsaeter and Hans Henrik Sievertsen, The Consumption Value of Higher Education, December 2009

    2872 Chris van Klaveren, Bernard van Praag and Henriette Maassen van den Brink, Collective Labor Supply of Native Dutch and Immigrant Households in the Netherlands, December 2009

    2873 Burkhard Heer and Alfred Maußner, Computation of Business-Cycle Models with the Generalized Schur Method, December 2009

    2874 Carlo Carraro, Enrica De Cian and Massimo Tavoni, Human Capital Formation and Global Warming Mitigation: Evidence from an Integrated Assessment Model, December 2009

    2875 André Grimaud, Gilles Lafforgue and Bertrand Magné, Climate Change Mitigation Options and Directed Technical Change: A Decentralized Equilibrium Analysis, December 2009

    2876 Angel de la Fuente, A Mixed Splicing Procedure for Economic Time Series, December 2009

    2877 Martin Schlotter, Guido Schwerdt and Ludger Woessmann, Econometric Methods for Causal Evaluation of Education Policies and Practices: A Non-Technical Guide, December 2009

    2878 Mathias Dolls, Clemens Fuest and Andreas Peichl, Automatic Stabilizers and Economic Crisis: US vs. Europe, December 2009

    2879 Tom Karkinsky and Nadine Riedel, Corporate Taxation and the Choice of Patent Location within Multinational Firms, December 2009

    2880 Kai A. Konrad, Florian Morath and Wieland Müller, Taxation and Market Power, December 2009

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark