Modifiable predictors of depression following childhood maltreatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article English OPEN
Braithwaite, E C ; O'Connor, R M ; Degli-Esposti, M ; Luke, N ; Bowes, L (2017)
  • Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
  • Journal: Translational Psychiatry, volume 7, issue 7, page e1162 (eissn: 2158-3188)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.140, pmc: PMC5538120
  • Subject: Original Article

Although maltreatment experiences in childhood increase the risk for depression, not all maltreated children become depressed. This review aims to systematically examine the existing literature to identify modifiable factors that increase vulnerability to, or act as a buffer against, depression, and could therefore inform the development of targeted interventions. Thirteen databases (including Medline, PsychINFO, SCOPUS) were searched (between 1984 and 2014) for prospective, longitudinal studies published in English that included at least 300 participants and assessed associations between childhood maltreatment and later depression. The study quality was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale checklist. Meta-analyses (random effects models) were performed on combined data to estimate the effect size of the association between maltreatment and depression. Meta-regressions were used to explore effects of study size and quality. We identified 22 eligible articles (N=12 210 participants), of which 6 examined potential modifiable predictors of depression following maltreatment. No more than two studies examined the same modifiable predictor; therefore, it was not possible to examine combined effects of modifiable predictors with meta-regression. It is thus difficult to draw firm conclusions from this study, but initial findings indicate that interpersonal relationships, cognitive vulnerabilities and behavioral difficulties may be modifiable predictors of depression following maltreatment. There is a lack of well-designed, prospective studies on modifiable predictors of depression following maltreatment. A small amount of initial research suggests that modifiable predictors of depression may be specific to maltreatment subtypes and gender. Corroboration and further investigation of causal mechanisms is required to identify novel targets for intervention, and to inform guidelines for the effective treatment of maltreated children.
  • References (40)
    40 references, page 1 of 4

    1 Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR et al. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003; 289: 3095-3105.

    2 Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor A, Kokaua J, Milne BJ, Polanczyk G et al. How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospective versus retrospective ascertainment. Psychol Med 2010; 40: 899-909.

    3 WHO. The World Health Report 2001 - Mental Health: New Understanding. New Hope: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.

    4 Greenberg PE, Fournier AA, Sisitsky T, Pike CT, Kessler RC. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry 2015; 76: 155-162.

    5 Lindert J, von Ehrenstein OS, Grashow R, Gal G, Braehler E, Weisskopf MG. Sexual and physical abuse in childhood is associated with depression and anxiety over the life course: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health 2014; 59: 359-372.

    6 Infurna MR, Reichl C, Parzer P, Schimmenti A, Bifulco A, Kaess M. Associations between depression and specific childhood experiences of abuse and neglect: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2016; 190: 47-55.

    7 Nanni V, Uher R, Danese A. Childhood maltreatment predicts unfavorable course of illness and treatment outcome in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2012; 169: 141-151.

    8 Smith PG, Day NE. The design of case-control studies: the influence of confounding and interaction effects. Int J Epidemiol 1984; 13: 356-365.

    9 Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al. The NewcastleOttowa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in metaanalyses 2013. Available from http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiol ogy/oxford.asp.

    10 Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-1558.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    13
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Central Archive at the University of Reading - IRUS-UK 0 8
    STORE - Staffordshire Online Repository - IRUS-UK 0 5
Share - Bookmark