Subject: prospect theory | BF | decision by sampling | loss aversion | context | Brief Reports
One of the most robust empirical findings in the behavioral sciences is loss aversion—the finding that losses loom larger than gains. We offer a new psychological explanation of the origins of loss aversion in which loss aversion emerges from differences in the distribu... View more
Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 134 -138. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.18.104.22.168283
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 73-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2118511
Camerer, C. F. (2005). Three cheers-Psychological, theoretical, empirical-For loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 129 -133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.22.214.171.124286
Ert, E., & Erev, I. (2013). On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: Six clarifications. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 214 -235.
Gal, D. (2006). A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 23-32.
Glöckner, A., & Pachur, T. (2012). Cognitive models of risky choice: Parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory. Cognition, 123, 21-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.002
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/1914185
List, J. A. (2004). Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica, 72, 615- 625. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00502.x
Morewedge, C. K., Shu, L. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 947-951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.014
Mullett, T. L., & Tunney, R. J. (2013). Value representations by rank order in a distributed network of varying context dependency. Brain and Cognition, 82, 76 - 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.010