Stereopsis, Visuospatial Ability, and Virtual Reality in Anatomy Learning

Article English OPEN
Luursema, Jan-Maarten; Vorstenbosch, Marc; Kooloos, Jan;
  • Publisher: Hindawi
  • Journal: Anatomy Research International,volume 2,017 (issn: 2090-2743, eissn: 2090-2751)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC5471569, doi: 10.1155/2017/1493135
  • Subject: QM1-695 | Human anatomy | Research Article | Article Subject

A new wave of virtual reality headsets has become available. A potential benefit for the study of human anatomy is the reintroduction of stereopsis and absolute size. We report a randomized controlled trial to assess the contribution of stereopsis to anatomy learning, f... View more
  • References (27)
    27 references, page 1 of 3

    [1] J. Steuer, “Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence,” Journal of Communication, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 73- 93, 1992.

    [2] K. Yammine and C. Violato, “A meta-analysis of the educational eefctiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 525-538, 2015.

    [3] H. Brenton, J. Hernandez, F. Bello et al., “Using multimedia and Web3D to enhance anatomy teaching,” Computers & Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 32-53, 2007.

    [4] R. B. Trelease, “Essential E-Learning and M-Learning Methods for Teaching Anatomy,” in In Teaching Anatomy, pp. 247-258, Springer, 2015.

    [5] A. X. Garg, G. R. Norman, K. W. Eva, L. Spero, and S. Sharan, “Is there any real virtue of virtual reality?: eTh minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers,” Academic Medicine, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. S97-S99, 2002.

    [6] A. J. Levinson, B. Weaver, S. Garside, H. McGinn, and G. R. Norman, “Virtual reality and brain anatomy: A randomised trial of e-learning instructional designs,” Medical Education, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 495-501, 2007.

    [7] J.-M. Luursema, W. B. Verwey, P. A. M. Kommers, R. H. Geelkerken, and H. J. Vos, “Optimizing conditions for computerassisted anatomical learning,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1123-1138, 2006.

    [8] D. T. Nicholson, C. Chalk, W. R. J. Funnell, and S. J. Daniel, “Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model,” Medical Education, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1081-1087, 2006.

    [9] H. M. Huang, S. S. Liaw, and C. M. Lai, “Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: a case study of desktop and projection-based display systems,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3-19, 2016.

    [10] M. F. Bradshaw, A. D. Parton, and R. A. Eagle, “eTh interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size,” Perception, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1317-1331, 1998.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark