Renewable Substitutability Index: Maximizing Renewable Resource Use in Buildings

Article, Other literature type English OPEN
Srinivasan, Ravi ; Campbell, Daniel ; Wang, Wei (2015)
  • Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
  • Journal: Buildings (issn: 2075-5309)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3390/buildings5020581
  • Subject: emergy analysis | Building construction | environmental building design | Renewable Substitutability Index (RSI) | TH1-9745 | Renewable Emergy Balance

In order to achieve a material and energy balance in buildings that is sustainable in the long run, there is an urgent need to assess the renewable and non-renewable resources used in the manufacturing process and to progressively replace non-renewable resources with renewables. Such progressive disinvestment in the non-renewable resources that may be substituted with renewable resources is referred to as “Renewable Substitutability” and if implemented, this process will lead to a paradigm shift in the way building materials are manufactured. This paper discusses the development of a Renewable Substitutability Index (RSI) that is designed to maximize the use of renewable resources in a building and quantifies the substitution process using solar emergy (i.e., the solar equivalent joules required for any item). The RSI of a building or a building component, i.e., floor or wall systems, etc., is the ratio of the renewable resources used during construction, including replacement and maintenance, to the building’s maximum renewable emergy potential. RSI values range between 0 and 1.0. A higher RSI achieves a low-energy building strategy promoting a higher order of sustainability by optimizing the use of renewables over a building’s lifetime from formation-extraction-manufacturing to maintenance, operation, demolition, and recycle.
  • References (24)
    24 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Guinee, J.B.; Heijungs, R.; Udo de Haes, H.A.; Huppes, G. Quantitative life cycle assessment of products: 2. Classification, valuation and improvement analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 1993, 1, 81-91.

    2. Madu, C.N. Handbook of Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 2001.

    3. Zabalza Bribián, I.; Aranda Usón, A.; Scarpellini, S. Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 2510-2520.

    4. Sartori, I.; Hestes, A.G. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article. Energy Build. 2007, 39, 249-257.

    5. Ramesh, T.; Prakash, R.; Shukla, K.K. Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 1592-1600.

    6. Asdrubali, F.; Baldassarri, C.; Fthenakis, V. Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy Build. 2013, 64, 73-89.

    7. Zhang, Y.; Singh, S.; Bakshi, B.R. Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, part I: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 7, 2232-2242.

    8. Hau, J.L. Toward Environmentally Conscious Process Systems Engineering via Joint Thermodynamic Accounting of Industrial and Ecological Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, May 2005.

    9. Odum, H.T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1996.

    10. Brown, M.T.; Williams, S.B.; Tilley, D.R.; Ulgiati, S. Emergy Synthesis: Theory and Applications of the Emergy Methodology. In Proceedings of the First Biennial Emergy Analysis Research Conference, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2-4 September, 1999.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark