The ethics of big data in big agriculture

Article English OPEN
Carbonell (Isabelle M.) (2016)
  • Publisher: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society gGmbH
  • Journal: (issn: 2197-6775, eissn: 2197-6775)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.14763/2016.1.405
  • Subject: Cybernetics | Computer science, knowledge & systems | Ethics | Commerce, communications & transportation | Agriculture | Internet Policy | Social Sciences | Q350-390 | Data-driven farming | Q300-390 | Information theory | Big data
    • ddc: ddc:380 | ddc:000 | ddc:340 | ddc:300

This paper examines the ethics of big data in agriculture, focusing on the power asymmetry between farmers and large agribusinesses like Monsanto. Following the recent purchase of Climate Corp., Monsanto is currently the most prominent biotech agribusiness to buy into big data. With wireless sensors on tractors monitoring or dictating every decision a farmer makes, Monsanto can now aggregate large quantities of previously proprietary farming data, enabling a privileged position with unique insights on a field-by-field basis into a third or more of the US farmland. This power asymmetry may be rebalanced through open-sourced data, and publicly-funded data analytic tools which rival Climate Corp. in complexity and innovation for use in the public domain.
  • References (11)
    11 references, page 1 of 2

    American Farm Bureau. (2015). The Voice of Agriculture [American Farm Bureau]. Retrieved from http://www.fb.org/newsroom/news_article/178/ American Farm Bureau. (2016, November). Privacy and Security Principles for Farm Data.

    Retrieved from http://www.fb.org/tmp/uploads/PrivacyAndSecurityPrinciplesForFarmData.pdf Andrejevic, M. (2014). Big Data, Big Questions| The Big Data Divide. International Journal of Communication, 8(0), 17.

    Angwin, J. (2014). Dragnet Nation: A Quest for Privacy, Security, and Freedom in a World of Relentless Surveillance. New York: Times Books.

    Armstrong, D. (2016). Monsanto Canada 2016 Technology Use Guide. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://www.monsanto.ca/ourcommitments/Do cuments/TUG_English.pdf Aylor, D. E., Schultes, N. P., & Shields, E. J. (2003). An aerobiological framework for assessing cross-pollination in maize. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 119(3 4), 111 129.

    http://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00159-X Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical Questions For Big Data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 15(5), 17.

    Bratspies, R. (2003). Myths of Voluntary Compliance: Lessons from the StarLink Corn Fiasco.

    William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 27(3), 593.

    Carlsson, N. O. L., Brönmark, C., & Hansson, L.-A. (2004). Invading Herbivory: The Golden Apple Snail Alters Ecosystem Functioning In Asian Wetlands. Ecology, 85(6), 1575 1580.

    http://doi.org/10.1890/03-3146 French Jr., J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150 167). Institute for Social Research.

    Friedberg, D. (2014, August). The Climate Corporation Platform Update: Helping Farmers Sustainably Protect and Improve their Operations. Powerpoint presented at the Whistle Stop.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark