Gendermetrics.NET: a novel software for analyzing the gender representation in scientific authoring

Article English OPEN
Bendels, Michael H. K.; Brüggmann, Dörthe; Schöffel, Norman; Groneberg, David A.;
  • Publisher: Springer Nature
  • Journal: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology,volume 11,issue 1 (issn: 1745-6673, eissn: 1745-6673)
  • Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1186/s12995-016-0133-6, pmc: PMC5024497
  • Subject: Toxicology | Software tool | Gender | Safety Research | Science structure | Scientometric analysis | Gender analysis | Bibliometric analysis | Methodology | Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • ddc: ddc:610

Background: Imbalances in female career promotion are believed to be strong in the field of academic science. A primary parameter to analyze gender inequalities is the gender authoring in scientific publications. Since the presently available data on gender distribution... View more
  • References (19)
    19 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Akhabue E, Lautenbach E. “Equal” contributions and credit. An emerging trend in the characterization of authorship. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20(11): 868-71. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004.

    2. Bates T, Anić A, Marusić M, Marusić A. Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. JAMA. 2004;292(1):86-8. doi:10.1001/jama.292.1.86.

    3. Boyle PJ, Smith LK, Cooper NJ, Williams KS, O'Connor H. Gender balance. Women are funded more fairly in social science. Nature. 2015;525(7568): 181-3. doi:10.1038/525181a.

    4. Brüggmann D, Handl V, Klingelhöfer D, Jaque J, Groneberg DA. Congenital toxoplasmosis. An in-depth density-equalizing mapping analysis to explore its global research architecture. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8(1):292. doi:10.1186/s13071- 015-1263-x.

    5. Buitendijk S, Corda D, Flodström A, Holdcroft A, Hunter J, Pollitzer E, et al. Women in science and medicine. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):811. doi:10.1016/ S0140-6736(11)60305-X.

    6. Falagas ME. Unique author identification number in scientific databases. A suggestion. PLoS Med. 2006;3(5):e249. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030249.

    7. Filardo, Giovanni; da Graca Briget; Sass Danielle M, Pollock Benjamin D, Smith Emma B, Martinez Melissa Ashley-Marie. Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals. Observational study (1994-2014). BMJ.2016:S. i847. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i847.

    8. Flannery AM. Success, women, and academic surgery. Surgery. 2002;131(6):670-1.

    9. Grauwin S, Jensen P. Mapping scientific institutions. Gendermetrics. 2011; 89(3):943-54. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0482-y.

    10. Larivière V, Ni C, Gingras Y, Cronin B, Sugimoto CR. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nature. 2013;504(7479):211-3.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark