Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity

Research, Preprint OPEN
Peter Egger ; Simon Loretz ; Michael Pfaffermayr ; Hannes Winner (2009)
  • Publisher: Munich: Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo)
  • Subject: C33 | F21 | H73 | F23 | H25 | corporate taxation, foreign, direct investment, panel econometrics | Corporate taxation; Foreign direct investment; Panel econometrics
    • jel: jel:H73 | jel:C33 | jel:F23 | jel:F21 | jel:H25
      ddc: ddc:330

This paper assesses the impact of corporate taxation on multinational activity. A numerically solvable general equilibrium model of trade and multinational firms is used to incorporate the following components of corporate taxation: parent and host country statutory corporate tax rates, withholding tax rates, and parent and host country depreciation allowances. We account for their differential impact under alternative methods of double taxation relief (i.e., credit, exemption, and deduction). The hypotheses regarding the effects of changes in the tax parameters are investigated in a panel of bilateral outbound stocks of foreign direct investment (FDI) from 52 parent and 45 host countries for the years 1991 to 2004. For this, we compile annual information on taxation to construct the largest existing panel of tax parameters at the bilateral level based on national tax law and bilateral tax treaties. Our findings indicate that the parent country’s statutory corporate tax rate tends to foster outward FDI, whereas the host country’s statutory corporate and withholding tax rates are negatively associated with outward FDI. Depreciation allowances exert a significant impact on FDI, as hypothesized.
  • References (72)
    72 references, page 1 of 8

    Altshuler, R., H. Grubert, and T.S. Newlon, 2001. Has US investment abroad become more sensitive to tax rates?, in J.R. Hines, Jr. (ed.), International Taxation and Multinational Activity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Alworth, J.S., 1988. The ¯nance, investment and taxation decisions of multinationals, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Arellano, M. and S. Bond, 1991. Some tests of speci¯cation for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to unemployment equations, The Review of Economic Studies 58, 277-294.

    Baier, S., G.P. Dwyer, and R. Tamura, 2002. How important are capital and total factor productivity for economic growth?, unpublished manuscript, Clemson University.

    Baltagi, B.H., 2005. The econometrics of panel data, 3rd ed., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Bartik, T.J., 1985. Business location decisions in the United States: estimates of the e®ects of unionization, taxes and other characteristics of States, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3, 14-22.

    B¶enassy-Qu¶er¶e, A., L. Fontagn¶e, and A. Lahrµeche-R¶evil, 2005. How does FDI react to corporate taxation?, International Tax and Public Finance 12, 583{603.

    Blonigen, B.A. and R.B. Davies, 2004. The e®ects of bilateral tax treaties on U.S. FDI activity, International Tax and Public Finance 11, 601{622.

    Blonigen, B.A., R.B. Davies, and K. Head, 2003. Estimating the knowledgecapital model of the multinational enterprise: Comment, American Economic Review 93, 980-994.

    Blonigen, B.A., R.B. Davies, G.R. Waddell, and H.T. Naughton, 2004. FDI in space: Spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment, NBER Working Paper No. 10939, Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark