Is it cheating – or learning the craft of writing? Using Turnitin to help students avoid plagiarism

Article English OPEN
Graham-Matheson, Lynne ; Starr, Simon (2013)
  • Publisher: Research in Learning Technology
  • Journal: Research in Learning Technology (issn: 2156-7077)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17218
  • Subject: LB2300 | higher education; plagiarism; assessment; Turnitin | learning technology

Plagiarism is a growing problem for universities, many of which are turning to software detection for help in detecting and dealing with it. This paper explores issues around plagiarism and reports on a study of the use of Turnitin in a new university. The purpose of the study was to inform the senior management team about the plagiarism policy and the use of Turnitin. The study found that staff and students largely understood the university’s policy and Turnitin’s place within it, and were very supportive of the use of Turnitin in originality checking. Students who had not used Turnitin were generally keen to do so. The recommendation to the senior management team, which was implemented, was that the use of Turnitin for originality checking should be made compulsory where possible – at the time of the study the use of Turnitin was at the discretion of programme directors. A further aim of the study was to contribute to the sector’s body of knowledge. Prevention of plagiarism through education is a theme identified by Badge and Scott (2009) who conclude an area lacking in research is “investigation of the impact of these tools on staff teaching practices”. Although a number of recent studies have considered educational use of Turnitin they focus on individual programmes or subject areas rather than institutions as a whole and the relationship with policy.Keywords: higher education; plagiarism; assessment; Turnitin(Published: 29 April 2013)Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2013, 21: 17218 -
  • References (34)
    34 references, page 1 of 4

    Abasi, A. R. & Graves, B. (2008) 'Academic literacy and plagiarism: conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors', Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 221 233.

    Ashworth, P., Bannister, P. & Thorne, P. (1997) 'Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment', Studies in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 187 203.

    Badge, J. & Scott, J. (2009) 'Dealing with plagiarism in the digital age', [online] Available at:

    Barrett, D. (2011) 'The epidemic at Britain's universities', The Daily Telegraph, 5 March, [online] Available at:

    Barrett, R. & Malcolm, J. (2006) 'Embedding plagiarism education in the assessment process', International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38 45.

    Barrie, J. (2008) 'Emerging educational practices for more original writing', Paper presented at the Third International Plagiarism Conference, Gateshead.

    Blackboard. (2008) 'Blackboard's SafeAssign (TM) used for one million student papers', [online] Available at: 19-May-2008 MW20080519

    Carroll, J. (2007) A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education, 2nd edn, Oxford Centre for Learning and Staff Development, Oxford.

    Crisp, G. T. (2007) 'Staff attitudes to dealing with plagiarism: issues and perspectives from one Australian university', International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3 15.

    Culwin, F. (2006a) 'An active introduction to academic misconduct and the measured demographics of misconduct', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 167 182.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Canterbury Research and Theses Environment - IRUS-UK 0 62
Share - Bookmark