Are brand benefits perceived differently in less developed economies ? A scale development and validation

Article English OPEN
Lacoeuilhe , Jérôme ; Ben Mrad , Selima ; Belaïd , Samy ; Petrescu , Maria (2017)
  • Publisher: Macmillan Publishers Ltd
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1057/s41270-017-0024-4
  • Subject: Symbolic | Measurement scale | Functional | Utilitarian | Experiential | [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration | Less developed economies | Affective | IRG_AXE1 | Brand benefits | [ SHS.GESTION ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration

International audience; The purpose of this paper is to develop a scale measuring consumers’ brand benefits in less developed economies. Based on the literature, items have been generated in qualitative and quantitative studies and tested by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The findings show that brand benefits converge into a two-factor structure (functional and symbolic) instead of three (functional, experiential and symbolic). These findings can be justified by the fact that consumers in developing economies do not have as much experience with brands as the ones from developed economies. The results also relate to previous literature findings on the topic of utilitarian and affective brand relationships. This scale can be used to advance the domain of brand benefits in a cross-cultural environment and can be employed by marketers when businesses plan to brand their products in developed economies.
  • References (83)
    83 references, page 1 of 9

    Aaker, D. 1991. Managing brand equity. Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Aaker, J.L. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347-356.

    Aaker, J.L., and S. Fournier. 1995. A brand as a character, a partner and a person: three perspectives on the question of brand personality. Advances in Consumer Research 22 (3): 391-395.

    Ahuvia, A. 2005. Beyond the extended self: loved objects and consumers' identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research 32 (1): 171-184.

    Ambler, T. 1997. How much of brand equity is explained by trust? Management Decision 35 (4): 283-292.

    Ambroise, L., G. Pantin-Sohier, P. Valette-Florence. 2007. De la personnalite´ des ce´le´brite´s a` la personnalite´ des marques. Nouvelle de´marche de se´lection des ambassadeurs. Actes du XXIIIeme Congre`s International de l'AFM, 31 mai et 1er juin, Aix-les-Bains, CD-ROM.

    Ambroise, L., and P. Valette-Florence. 2010. Me´taphore de la personnalite´ de la marque et stabilite´ inter-produits d'un barome`tre spe´cifique. Recherche et Applications en Marketing 25 (2): 3-29.

    Armstrong, G., and P. Kotler. 2015. Marketing: An introduction. New York, NY: Pearson.

    Arora, S., A.D. Kalro, and D. Sharma. 2015. A comprehensive framework of brand name classification. Journal of Brand Management 22 (2): 79-116.

    Atsmon, Y., J. Kuentz, and J. Seong. 2012. Building brands in emerging markets. McKinsey Quarterly 4: 50-57.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark