## The shuffle estimator for explainable variance in fMRI experiments

*Benjamini, Yuval*;

*Yu, Bin*;

- Publisher: The Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Journal: issn: 1932-6157
Related identifiers: doi: 10.1214/13-AOAS681 - Subject: Statistics - Applications | vision | explainable variance | shuffle estimator | Analysis-of-variance | prediction | permutations | random-effects | fMRI | encoding modelsarxiv: Quantitative Biology::Neurons and Cognition

- References (30)
Benjamini, Y. and Yu, B. (2013). Supplement to “The shuffle estimator for explainable variance in fMRI experiments.” DOI:10.1214/13-AOAS681SUPP.

Buracas, G. T. and Boynton, G. M. (2002). Efficient design of event-related fMRI experiments using M-sequences. NeuroImage 16 801-813.

Carandini, M., Demb, J. B., Mante, V., Tolhurst, D. J., Dan, Y., Olshausen, B. A., Gallant, J. L. and Rust, N. C. (2005). Do we know what the early visual system does? J. Neurosci. 25 10577-10597.

Dayan, P. and Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. MR1985615

Fox, M. D. and Raichle, M. E. (2007). Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 700-711.

Haefner, R. and Cumming, B. (2008). An improved estimator of variance explained in the presence of noise. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 21 585-592.

Hsu, A., Borst, A. and Theunissen, F. E. (2004). Quantifying variability in neural responses and its application for the validation of model predictions. Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 15 91-109.

Huettel, S. A. (2012). Event-related fMRI in cognition. NeuroImage 62 1152-1156.

Josephs, O., Turner, R. and Friston, K. (1997). Event-related fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5 243-248.

Kay, K. N., Naselaris, T., Prenger, R. J. and Gallant, J. L. (2008). Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature 452 352-355.

- Related Research Results (1) Inferred
Reconstructing Speech from Human Auditory Cortex (2012) 61% - Metrics No metrics available

- Download from

- Funded by

- Cite this publication