publication . Article . Other literature type . 2018

Capturing and missing the patient's story through outcome measures: A thematic comparison of patient-generated items in PSYCHLOPS with CORE-OM and PHQ-9

Mark Ashworth; Célia M. D. Sales; Paula Alves; Paula Alves; Inês Neves;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Jun 2018 Journal: Health Expectations, volume 21, pages 615-619 (issn: 1369-6513, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Wiley
© 2017 The Authors Health Expectations Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background: There is increasing interest in individualized patient-reported outcome measures (I-PROMS), where patients themselves indicate the specific problems they want to address in therapy and these problems are used as items within the outcome measurement tool. Objective: This paper examined the extent to which 279 items reported in an I-PROM (PSYCHLOPS) added qualitative information w...
free text keywords: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Individualised PROMS, Patient-centred outome, Patient-generated measures, :Ciências Médicas::Ciências da Saúde [Domínio/Área Científica], Ciências psicológicas, Psicologia, Psychological sciences, Psychology, :Psicologia [Ciências sociais], :Psychology [Social sciences], individualised PROMS; outcome assessment; patient-centred outome; patient-generated measures; thematic analysis, Original Research Paper, Original Research Papers, patient‐centred outome, patient‐generated measures, Thematic map, License, Outcome measures, Creative commons, Outcome assessment, Attribution, Thematic analysis, Psychology, Applied psychology, Natural language processing, computer.software_genre, computer, Artificial intelligence, business.industry, business
Funded by
FCT| SFRH/BD/87308/2012
  • Funder: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT)
  • Project Code: SFRH/BD/87308/2012
  • Funding stream: SFRH | Doutoramento
FCT| UID/PSI/03125/2013
Center for Research and Social Intervention
  • Funder: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT)
  • Project Code: 147229
  • Funding stream: 5876
FCT| UID/PSI/00050/2013
Center for Psychology at University of Porto
  • Funder: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT)
  • Project Code: 147225
  • Funding stream: 5876
Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
21 references, page 1 of 2

1. Elliott R, Wagner J, Sales CMD, Rodgers B, Alves P, Café M. Psychometrics of the personal questionnaire: a client-generated outcome measure. Psychol Assess. 2016;28:263-278.

2. Sales CMD, Alves P. Patient centred assessment in Psychotherapy: a review of individualised tools. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2016;23:265-283.

3. Sales CMD, Alves P, Evans C, Elliott R, On behalf of IPHA Group. The Individualised Patient-Progress System (IPPS): a decade of international collaborative networking. Couns Psychother Res 2014;14:181-191.

4. Ashworth M, Evans C, Clement S. Measuring psychological outcomes after cognitive behavior therapy in primary care: a comparison between a new patient-generated measure “PSYCHLOPS” (Psychological Outcome Profiles) and “HADS” (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). J Ment Health. 2009;18:1-9.

5. Ashworth M, Robinson S, Evans C, Shepherd M, Conolly A, Rowlands G. What does an idiographic measure (PSYCHLOPS) tell us about the spectrum of psychological issues and scores on a nomothetic measure (CORE-OM)? Prim Care Community Psychiatry. 2007;12:7-16.

6. Hédinsson H, Kristjánsdóttir H, Ólason D, Sigurosson J. A validation and replication study of the patient-generated measure PSYCHLOPS on an Icelandic Clinical Population. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2013;29:89-95. [OpenAIRE]

7. Sales CMD, Alves P. Individualized patient-progress systems: why we need to move towards a personalized evaluation of psychological treatments. Can Psychol. 2012;53:115-121.

8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

9. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325:1-5.

10. Haynes SN, Mumma GM, Pinson C. Idiographic assessment: conceptual and psychometric foundations of individualized behavioral assessment. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:179-191.

11. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patientbased outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:1-86.

12. Ashworth M, Robinson S, Godfrey E, et al. The experiences of therapists using a new client-centred psychometric instrument, 'PSYCHLOPS' ('Psychological Outcome Profiles'). Couns Psychother Res. 2005;5:37-41.

13. Sales CMD, Gonçalves S, Fragoeiro A, Noronha S, Elliott R. Psychotherapists openness to routine naturalistic idiographic research? Ment Health Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2007;4:145-161. [OpenAIRE]

14. Ashworth M, Robinson S, Godfrey E, et al. Measuring mental health outcomes in primary care: the psychometric properties of a new patient-generated outcome measure, “PSYCHLOPS” (psychological outcome profiles). Prim Care Ment Health. 2005;3:261-270.

15. Ashworth M, Shepherd M, Chistey J, et al. A client-generated psychometric instrument: the development of “PSYCHLOPS”. Couns Psychother Res. 2004;4:27-31.

21 references, page 1 of 2
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue