Self-interest, Sympathy and the Invisible Hand: From Adam Smith to Market Liberalism

Article, Preprint OPEN
Avner Offer (2012)
  • Journal: Economic Thought, volume 1, issue 2 December, pages 1-1

Adam Smith rejected Mandeville's invisible-hand doctrine of 'private vices, publick benefits'. In The Theory of Moral Sentiments his model of the 'impartial spectator' is driven not by sympathy for other people, but by their approbation. The innate capacity for sympathy makes approbation credible. Approbation needs to be authenticated, and in Smith's model authentication relies on innate virtue, which is not realistic. An alternative model of 'regard' makes use of signalling and is more pragmatic. Modern versions of the invisible hand in rational choice theory and neo- liberalism are shown to be radical departures from the ethical legacy of Enlightenment and utilitarian economics, and are not consistent with Adam Smith's own position.
  • References (8)

    Montes, L. (2003). "Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stages of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy." Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25(1): 63- 90.

    Nieli, R. (1986). "Spheres of Intimacy and the Adam Smith Problem." Journal of the History of Ideas 47(4): 611-624.

    Offer, A. (1997). "Between the Gift and the Market: The Economy of Regard." Economic History Review 50(3): 450-476.

    Offer, A. (2006). The Challenge of Affluence : Self-Control and Well-Being in the United States and Britain since 1950. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Offer, A. (2012). "A Warrant for Pain: Caveat Emptor vs. the Duty of Care in American Medicine, c. 1970- 2010." Real-world Economics Review (61): 85-99.

    Robbins, L. R. (1932). An Essay on the Nature & Significance of Economic Science. London, Macmillan.

    Robertson, D. H. (1956). What Do Economists Economize On? Economic Commentaries. Ed. London, Staples Press: 147-154.

    Rothschild, E. (2001). Economic Sentiments : Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark