Share  Bookmark

 Download from


SCENARIO 2: POLARIZATION DECREASES SCENARIO 3: POLARIZATION UNCHANGED AABERGE, R. (2000): "Ranking Intersecting Lorenz Curves", Discussion Paper 271, Statistics Norway Research Department.
BUHMANN, B.; RAINWATER, L.; SCHMAUS, G. and SMEEDING, T. (1988): "Equivalence scales, wellbeing, inequality and poverty: sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) database", Review of Income and Wealth, n.º 34, pps. 115142.
CASSOU, S. P. and LANSING, K. J. (2003): "Growth effects of shifting from a graduatedrate tax system to a flat tax", Economic Inquiry, forthcoming.
COULTER, F. A.; COWELL, F. A. and JENKINS, S. P. (1992): "Difference in Needs and Assessment of Income Distributions", Bulletin of Economic Research, n.º 44, pps. 77124.
COWELL, F. A. and VictoriaFeser, M.P. (1996): "Poverty measurement with contaminated data: a robust approach", European Economic Review, n.º 40, pps. 17611771.
DAVIDSON R. and DUCLOS, J.Y. (2000): "Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality", Econometrica, n.º 68, pps. 14351464.
DAVIDSON R. and MACKINNON, J. G. (1993): Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford University Press.
DAVIES, J. B. and HOY, M. (1994): "The Normative Significance Using ThirdDegree Stochastic Dominance in Comparing Income Distributions", Journal of Economic Theory, n.º 64, pps. 520530.
 1995): "Making Inequality Comparisons when Lorenz Curves Intersect", American Economic Review, n.º 85, pps. 980986.
 (2002): "Flat Rate Taxes and Inequality Measurement", Journal of Public Economics, n.º 84, pps. 3346.