LTDNA evidence on trial

Article English OPEN
Roberts, Paul.;
(2016)
  • Publisher: Frontiers Media
  • Journal: Frontiers in Genetics,volume 7 (issn: 1664-8021, eissn: 1664-8021)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00180/full, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00180, pmc: PMC5078688
  • Subject: expert evidence, criminal adjudication, LTDNA profiling evidence, comparative criminal procedure, Law-Science, interdisciplinarity | comparative criminal procedure | QH426-470 | Genetics | LTDNA profiling evidence | Original Research | expert evidence | interdisciplinarity | criminal adjudication | Law-Science

Adopting the interpretative/hermeneutical method typical of much legal scholarship, this article considers two sets of issues pertaining to LTDNA profiles as evidence in criminal proceedings. The section titled Expert Evidence as Forensic Epistemic Warrant addresses som... View more
  • References (6)

    Received: 17 May 2016

    Accepted: 26 September 2016

    Published: 25 October 2016

    Citation: Roberts P (2016) LTDNA Evidence on

    Trial. Front. Genet. 7:180.

    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00180 56Cf. R v McIlkenny (1991) 93 Cr App R 287 (CA); R v Maguire (1992) 94 Cr App R 133 (CA); Sir John May, Inquiry into the Circumstances Surrounding the Convictions Arising Out of the Bomb Attacks on Guildford and Woolwich in 1974, HC Paper 556 (1990) and HC Paper 296 (1992); Mike Redmayne, “Expert Evidence and Scientific Disagreement” (1997) 30 UC Davis Law Reviw 1027; Clive Walker and Russell Stockdale, “Forensic Evidence and Terrorist Trials in the United Kingdom” (1995) 54 Cambridge Law Journal 69. 57R v Smith (Peter) [2011] 2 Cr App R 16, [2011] EWCA Crim 1296. See further, Simon A Cole and Andrew Roberts, “Certainty, Individualization and the Subjective Nature of Expert Fingerprint Evidence” [2012] Criminal Law Review 824; Jennifer L. Mnookin, “The Validity of Latent Fingerprint Identification: Confessions of a Fingerprinting Moderate” (2008) 7 Law, Probability and Risk 127; Robert Epstein, “Fingerprints Meet Daubert: The Myth of Fingerprint “Science” is Revealed” (2002) 75 Southern California Law Review 605. 58R v Reed and Reed; R v Garmson [2010] 1 Cr App R 23, [2009] EWCA Crim 2698, [107]. 59Ibid [103].

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    65
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    FromNumber Of ViewsNumber Of Downloads
    Nottingham ePrints - IRUS-UK 0 65
Share - Bookmark