The differentiated impacts of organizational innovation practices on technological innovation persistence

Article English OPEN
Le Bas , Christian ; Mothe , Caroline ; Nguyen-Thi , Thuc Uyen (2015)
  • Publisher: Emerald
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2012-0085
  • Subject: innovation | JEL : O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D | organizational innovation | JEL : O.O3.O31 | JEL : O.O3.O32 | Business performance | Knowledge management | Competences | Organizational change | R&D | JEL : L - Industrial Organization | [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration | JEL : O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives | Technological innovation | JEL : L | Manufacturing | persistence | [ SHS.GESTION ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration | Behaviour | JEL : L - Industrial Organization/L.L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior/L.L2.L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope | JEL : L.L2.L25
    acm: ComputingMilieux_GENERAL

International audience; Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test the major determinants of technological (product and process) innovation persistence and provides evidence of the significant role of organizational innovation. Design/methodology/approach – Data came from two waves of the Luxembourg Community Innovation Survey (CIS): CIS2006 for 2004-2006 and CIS2008 for 2006-2008. The longitudinal data set resulted in a final sample of 287 firms. A multinomial probit model estimates the likelihood that each firm belongs to one of three longitudinal innovation profiles: no, sporadic, or persistent innovators. Findings – The determinants have differentiated impacts on process and technological innovation persistence. Organizational innovation influences technological innovation persistence. In the analysis of detailed organizational practices, strong evidence emerged that knowledge management exerts a crucial effect on product innovation persistence; workplace organization instead is associated with process innovation persistence. Research limitations/implications – The relationships of innovation persistence, organizational innovation, and firms' economic performance demand further exploration. The different persistence patterns of complex (process and product) and simple (process or product) innovators also are worth investigating. Practical implications – Organizational innovation matters for technological innovation persistence. However, the effects of non-technological innovation differ depending on whether the firm wants to innovate in processes or products. Managers must acknowledge these various effects and select appropriate strategies. Originality/value – Few works account for the impact of organizational innovation strategies on technological innovation. This study is the first, based on recent CIS data, to address the role of organizational innovation practices for technological innovation persistence, which appears necessary for the sustainable dynamics of firms, industries, and regions.
  • References (59)
    59 references, page 1 of 6

    Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. and Howitt, P. (2005), “Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 120 No. 2, pp. 701-728.

    Alänge, S. and Steiber, A. (2011), “Diffusion of organisational innovations: an empirical test of an analytical framework”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 881-897.

    Antonelli, C. (2011), Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Antonelli, C., Crespi, F. and Scellato, G. (2010), “Inside innovation persistence: new evidence from italian micro-data”, working paper, University of Turin.

    Antonelli, C., Crespi, F. and Scellato, G. (2012), “Inside innovation persistence: new evidence from Italian micro-data”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 341-353.

    Armbruster, H., Bikfalvib, A., Kinkela, S. and Lay, G. (2008), “Organizational innovation: the challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys”, Technovation, Vol. 28, pp. 644-657.

    Becerra-Fernandez, I. and Sabherwal, R. (2001), “Organizational knowledge management: a contingency perspective”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 23-55.

    Bharadwaj, S. and Menon, A. (2000), “Making innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both?”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 424-434.

    Bresnahan, T.F., Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (2002), “Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117 No. 1, pp. 339-376.

    Cefis, E. (2003), “Is there any persistence in innovative activities?”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 489-515.

  • Similar Research Results (4)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark