Genetic diversity is a predictor of mortality in humans

Article English OPEN
Bihlmeyer, Nathan A ; Brody, Jennifer A ; Smith, Albert Vernon ; Lunetta, Kathryn L ; Nalls, Mike ; Smith, Jennifer A ; Tanaka, Toshiko ; Davies, Gail ; Yu, Lei ; Mirza, Saira Saeed ; Teumer, Alexander ; Coresh, Josef ; Pankow, James S ; Franceschini, Nora ; Scaria, Anish ; Oshima, Junko ; Psaty, Bruce M ; Gudnason, Vilmundur ; Eiriksdottir, Gudny ; Harris, Tamara B ; Li, Hanyue ; Karasik, David ; Kiel, Douglas P ; Garcia, Melissa ; Liu, Yongmei ; Faul, Jessica D ; Kardia, Sharon LR ; Zhao, Wei ; Ferrucci, Luigi ; Allerhand, Michael ... view all 52 authors (2014)

Background: It has been well-established, both by population genetics theory and direct observation in many organisms, that increased genetic diversity provides a survival advantage. However, given the limitations of both sample size and genome-wide metrics, this hypothesis has not been comprehensively tested in human populations. Moreover, the presence of numerous segregating small effect alleles that influence traits that directly impact health directly raises the question as to whether global measures of genomic variation are themselves associated with human health and disease. Results: We performed a meta-analysis of 17 cohorts followed prospectively, with a combined sample size of 46,716 individuals, including a total of 15,234 deaths. We find a significant association between increased heterozygosity and survival (P = 0.03). We estimate that within a single population, every standard deviation of heterozygosity an individual has over the mean decreases that person’s risk of death by 1.57%. Conclusions: This effect was consistent between European and African ancestry cohorts, men and women, and major causes of death (cancer and cardiovascular disease), demonstrating the broad positive impact of genomic diversity on human survival. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12863-014-0159-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • References (16)
    16 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [http://www.omim.org/]

    2. Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS, Manolio TA: Potential etiologic and functional implications of genomewide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:9362-9367.

    3. Mitton JB, Grant MC: Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1984, 15:479-499.

    4. Alibert P, Renaud S, Dod B, Bonhomme F, Auffray JC: Fluctuating asymmetry in the Mus musculus hybrid zone: a heterotic effect in disrupted co-adapted genomes. Proc Biol Sci 1994, 258:53-59.

    5. Roberts SC, Little AC, Gosling LM, Perrett DI, Carter V, Jones BC, Penton-Voak I, Petrie M: MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 2005, 26:213-226.

    6. Coetzee V, Barrett L, Greeff JM, Henzi SP, Perrett DI, Wadee AA: Common HLA alleles associated with health, but Not with facial attractiveness. PLoS One 2007, 2:e640.

    7. Campbell H, Carothers AD, Rudan I, Hayward C, Biloglav Z, Barac L, Pericic M, Janicijevic B, Smolej-Narancic N, Polasek O, Kolcic I, Weber JL, Hastie ND, Rudan P, Wright AF: Effects of genome-wide heterozygosity on a range of biomedically relevant human quantitative traits. Hum Mol Genet 2007, 16:233-241.

    8. Takata H, Ishii T, Suzuki M, Sekiguchi S, Iri H: Influence of major histocompatibility complex region genes on human longevity among okinawan-japanese centenarians and nonagenarians. Lancet 1987, 330:824-826.

    9. Lie HC, Simmons LW, Rhodes G: Does genetic diversity predict health in humans? PLoS One 2009, 4:e6391.

    10. Piertney SB, Oliver MK: The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity 2005, 96:7-21.

  • Related Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available