Subject: [ SDV ] Life Sciences [q-bio] | Genetics(clinical) | Genetics | Animal Science and Zoology | Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | Research
International audience; AbstractBackgroundGenetic selection has been successful in achieving increased production in dairy cattle; however, corresponding declines in fitness traits have been documented. Selection for fitness traits is more difficult, since they have low... View more
1. Rauw WM, Kanis E, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Grommers FJ. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livest Prod Sci. 1998;56:15-33.
2. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, et al. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:16-24.
3. Veerkamp RF, Mulder HA, Thompson R, Calus MPL. Genomic and pedigree-based genetic parameters for scarcely recorded traits when some animals are genotyped. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:4189-97.
4. Simeone R, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Vitezica ZG. Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single-step genomic evaluation procedure. J Anim Breed Genet. 2012;129:3-10.
5. Ostersen T, Christensen OF, Henryon M, Nielsen B, Su G, Madsen P. Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs. Genet Sel Evol. 2011;43:38.
6. Olson KM, Vanraden PM, Tooker ME, Cooper TA. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:2613-20.
7. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
8. Gianola D, de los Campos G, Hill WG, Manfredi E, Fernando R. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics. 2009;183:347-63.