Talking about the institutional complexity of the integrated rehabilitation system – the importance of coordination

Article English OPEN
Sari Miettinen; Ulla Ashorn; Juhani Lehto;
  • Publisher: Ubiquity Press
  • Journal: International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC), volume 13 (issn: 1568-4156, eissn: 1568-4156)
  • Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3653285, doi: 10.5334/ijic.851
  • Subject: complexity | rehabilitation | Research and Theory | R5-920 | Kansanterveystiede, ympäristö ja työterveys - Public health care science, environmental and occupational health | Medicine (General) | rehabilitation; welfare services; coordination; governance; equity; complexity | welfare services | equity | coordination | governance

<p>Rehabilitation in Finland is a good example of functions divided among several welfare sectors, such as health services and social services.  The rehabilitation system in Finland is a complex one and there have been many efforts to create a coordinated entity. The pu... View more
  • References (61)
    61 references, page 1 of 7

    1. Miettinen S, Ashorn U, Lehto J, Viitanen E. Coordination of a complex welfare system. Case: rehabilitation entity in Finland. International Journal of Health Planning & Management 2011a;26:e1-e16.

    2. Pulkki J, Rissanen P, Raitanen J, Viitanen E. Overlaps and accumulation in the use of rehabilitation services. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2011a;34(3):255-60.

    3. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. Denmark, Finland, Ireland and the Netherlands. Vol. 3: OECD Publishing; 2008. [cited 2013 3 March]. Available from:

    4. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A Synthesis of findings across OECD Countries, OECD Publish - ing; 2010. [cited 2013 3 March]. Available from:

    5. Wihlman U, Lundborg CS, Axelsson R, Holmström I. Barriers of inter-organisational integration in vocational rehabilitation. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2008 Jun 19;8. [cited 2012 Apr 30]. Available from: URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-100476.

    6. McPherson KM, Taylor WJ, Leplege A. Rehabilitation outcomes: values, methodologies and applications. Disability & Rehabilitation 2010;32(12):961-4.

    7. Velcoff J, Hernandez B, Keys C. Employment and vocational rehabilitation experiences of Latinos with disabilities with differing patterns of acculturation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 2010;33(1):51-64.

    8. OECD. Sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon monikanavaisen rahoituksen edut, haitat ja kehittämistarpeet. [Advantages, Disadvantages and Developmental Challenges in the Multisource Financing of Social and Health Care]. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL). Publication No. 4; 2011. [cited 2012 Oct 15]. Available from: hankkeet/ramu/hankkeita/rahoitusjarjestelma. [in Finnish].

    9. STM. Hallituksen selonteko eduskunnalle [Government's rehabilitation report to the Parliament]. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Publication No. 6; 2002. [in Finnish].

    10. Paatero H. Mikä vika kuntoutusjärjestelmässä? [What is the problem with the rehabilitation system?]. Kuntoutus 2008;25(4): 3-10. [in Finnish].

  • Related Organizations (2)
  • Metrics