Dividend Announcements Reconsidered - Dividend Changes versus Dividend Surprises

Research, Preprint OPEN
Christian Andres ; André Betzer ; Inga van den Bongard ; Christian Haesner ; Erik Theissen (2011)
  • Publisher: Cologne: University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR)
  • Subject: Ownership Structure | Deutschland | Dividende | Börsenkurs | G35 | Dividend Announcements,Market Efficiency,Ownership Structure,Agency Theory | G34 | Agency Theory | Dividend Announcements, Market Efficiency, Ownership Structure, Agency Theory | Dividend Announcements | Ankündigungseffekt | Schätzung | Market Efficiency | Signalling
    • jel: jel:G34 | jel:G35
      ddc: ddc:330

This paper reconsiders the issue of share price reactions to dividend announcements. Previous papers rely almost exclusively on a naive dividend model in which the dividend change is used as a proxy for the dividend surprise. We use the difference between the actual dividend and the analyst consensus forecast as obtained from I/B/E/S as a proxy for the dividend surprise. Using data from Germany, we find significant share price reactions after dividend announcements. Once we control for analysts' expectations, the dividend change loses explanatory power. Our results thus suggest that the naive model should be abandoned. We use panel methods to analyze the determinants of the share price reactions and find evidence in favor of the cash flow signaling hypothesis and dividend clientele effects. We further find that the price reaction to dividend surprises is related to the ownership structure of the firm. The results do not support the free cash flow hypothesis.
  • References (39)
    39 references, page 1 of 4

    Aharony, J. and Swary, I., “Quarterly Dividend and Earnings Announcements and Stockholders' Return: An Empirical Analysis,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1980, pp. 1-12.

    Amihud, Y. and Li, K., “The Declining Information Content of Dividend Announcements and the Effects of Institutional Holdings,” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2006, pp. 637-660.

    Amihud, Y. and Murgia, M., “Dividends, Taxes, and Signaling: Evidence from Germany,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 1, 1997, pp. 397-408.

    Andres, C., “Large Shareholders and Firm Performance: An Empirical Examination of Founding-Family Ownership,” The Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, 2008, pp. 431-445.

    Andres, C., Betzer, A., Goergen, M. and Renneboog, L., “Dividend Policy of German Firms: A Panel Data Analysis of Partial Adjustment Models,” The Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2009, pp. 175-187.

    Bajaj, M. and Vijh, A., "Dividend Clienteles and the Information Content of Dividend Changes,” The Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1990, pp. 193-219.

    Bar-Yosef, S. and O. Sarig: Dividend Surprises Inferred from Option and Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, No. 4, 1992, pp. 1623-1640.

    Battalio, R. and Mendenhall, R., "Earnings Expectations, Investor Trade Size, and Anomalous Returns around Earnings Announcements,” The Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 77, No. 2, 2005, pp. 289-319.

    Bebchuk, L., “A Rent-Protection Theory of Corporate Ownership and Control,” NBER Working Paper 7203, 1999.

    Becht, M. and Boehmer, E., “Ownership and Voting Power in Germany,” in: Becht, M. and Boehmer, E. (eds.), The Control of Corporate Europe, Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 128-53.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark