The Informal Sector

Preprint OPEN
Jose Scheinkman ; Aureo de Paula (2007)
  • Subject: Informal Sector, VAT, Tax Avoidance
    • jel: jel:K4 | jel:H2 | jel:H3
    acm: ComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTING

This paper investigates the determinants of informal economic activity. We present two equilibrium models of informality and test their implications using a survey of 48,000+ small firms in Brazil. We define informality as tax avoidance; firms in the informal sector avoid tax payments but suffer other limitations. In the first model there is a single industry and informal firms face a higher cost of capital and a limitation on size. As a result informal firms are smaller and have a lower capital labor ratio. When education is an imperfect proxy for ability, we show that the interaction of the manager’s education and formality has a positive correlation with firm size. These implications are supported by our empirical analysis. A novel theoretical contribution in this paper is a model that highlights the role of value added taxes in transmitting informality. It predicts that the informality of a firm is correlated to the informality of firms from which it buys or sells. The model also implies that higher tolerance for informal firms in one production stage increases tax avoidance in downstream and upstream sectors. Empirical analysis shows that, in fact, various measures of formality of suppliers and purchasers (and its enforcement) are correlated with the formality of a firm. Even more interestingly, when we look at sectors where Brazilian firms are not subject to the credit system of value added tax, but instead the value added tax is applied at some stage of production at a rate that is estimated by the State, this chain effect vanishes.
  • References (22)
    22 references, page 1 of 3

    [1] Almeida, R. and Z. Bianchini, 1998, “Aspectos de Amostragem da Pesquisa de Economia Informal Urbana”, Texto para Discusso No.89, IBGE.

    [2] Almeida, R. and P. Carneiro, 2005, “Enforcement of Regulation, Informal Labor and Firm Performance”, IZA Discussion Paper No.1759.

    [3] Bound, J., C. Brown and N. Mathiowetz, 2005, “Measurement Error in Survey Data in J. Heckman and E. Leamer (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, V.5., North-Holland: Amsterdam.

    [4] De Soto, H., 1989, The Other Path: the Invisible Revolution in the Third World, Harper and Row.

    [5] De Soto, H., 2000, The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, Basic Books.

    [6] Emran, M. and J. Stiglitz, 2005, “On Selective Indirect Tax Reform in Developin Countries”, Journal of Public Economics, 89, pp.599-623.

    [7] Fajnzylber, P., W. Maloney and G. Montes Rojas, 2007, “Does Formality Improve Micro-Firm Performance? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from the Brazilian SIMPLES Program”, World Bank Working Paper.

    [8] Fortin, B., N. Marceau and L. Savard, 1997, “Taxation, Wage Controls and the Informal Sector”, Jounal of Public Economics, 66, pp.293-312.

    [9] Friedman, E., S. Johnson, D. Kaufmann and P. Zoido-Lobaton, 2000, “Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries”, Journal of Public Economics, 76, pp.459-493.

    [10] Intituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat´ıstica (IBGE), 2003, Sistema de Contas Nacionais - Brasil, S´erie Relat´orios Metodol´ogicos, V.24.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark