Alternative measures of the Federal Reserve banks' cost of equity capital

Research, Preprint OPEN
Michelle L. Barnes ; Jose A. Lopez (2005)
  • Publisher: Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
  • Subject: Kapitalkosten | USA | return on equity | G11 | G28 | Zahlungsverkehr | payments system | CAPM | Financial services industry ; Federal Reserve banks - Service charges ; Federal Reserve banks - Costs | Capital Asset Pricing Model | Zentralbank | Messung | cost of equity | Capital assets pricing model ; Payment systems
    • ddc: ddc:330

The Monetary Control Act of 1980 requires the Federal Reserve System to provide payment services to depository institutions through the twelve Federal Reserve Banks at prices that fully reflect the costs a private-sector provider would incur, including a cost of equity capital (COE). Although Fama and French (1997) conclude that COE estimates are “woefully” and “unavoidably” imprecise, the Reserve Banks require such an estimate every year. We examine several COE estimates based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and compare them using econometric and materiality criteria. Our results suggest that the benchmark CAPM applied to a large peer group of competing firms provides a COE estimate that is not clearly improved upon by using a narrow peer group, introducing additional factors into the model, or taking account of additional firm-level data, such as leverage and line-of-business concentration. Thus, a standard implementation of the benchmark CAPM provides a reasonable COE estimate, which is needed to impute costs and set prices for the Reserve Banks’ payments business.
  • References (27)
    27 references, page 1 of 3

    Barnes, M.L. and Hughes, A.W., 2001. “Conditional Beta Estimation and Forecasting with Panel Data Methods,” Manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 1990. “The Federal Reserve in the Payments System,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, May, 293-298.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2005. “Federal Reserve Bank Services Private Sector Adjustment Factor,” Press release, October 15.

    Bower, D.H., Bower, R.S. and Logue, D.E., 1984. “Arbitrage Pricing Theory and Utility Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, 39, 1041-1054.

    Bruner, R.F., Eades, K.M., Harris, R.S. and Higgins, R.C., 1998. “Best Practices in Estimating the Cost of Capital: Survey and Synthesis,” Financial Practice and Education, 8, 13-28.

    Committee on the Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism. 1998. The Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism. Washington, D.C.: Federal Reserve System.

    Cummins, J.D. and Phillips, R.D., 2003. “Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital for PropertyLiability Insurers,” Working paper #03-17, The Wharton Financial Institutions Center.

    Damodaran, A., 2001. Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Division of Federal Reserve Bank Operations, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 1983. “Private Sector Adjustment Factor for 1984,” Federal Register, October 18, Issue 202, 48288-48295 [Docket No. R-0485].

    Ehrhardt, M.C. and Bhagwat, Y.N., 1991. “A Full-Information Approach for Estimating Divisional Betas,” Financial Management, 20, 60-69.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark