Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making

Article OPEN
Michael D. Lee; Benjamin R. Newell;
(2011)
  • Publisher: eScholarship, University of California
  • Journal: Judgment and Decision Making,volume 6,issue 8 December,pages832-842 (issn: 1930-2975)
  • Subject: Social and Behavioral Sciences | models | heuristic decision-making | frugal | strategies | BF1-990 | Economics as a science | stopping rules.NAKeywords | hierarchical Bayesian models | evidence accumulation | Psychology | hierarchical Bayesian models, Bayesian inference, heuristic decision-making, take-the-best, search rules, stopping rules. | search rules | HB71-74 | information | rationality | take-the-best | Bayesian inference

Hierarchical Bayesian methods offer a principled and comprehensive way to relate psychological models to data. Here we use them to model the patterns of information search, stopping and deciding in a simulated binary comparison judgment task. The simulation involves 20 ... View more
  • References (46)
    46 references, page 1 of 5

    Brighton, H., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Towards competitive instead of biased testing of heuristics: A reply to Hilbig & Richter (2011). Topics in Cognitive Science, 197-205.

    Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the “adaptive toolbox”: Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 611-625.

    Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2006). Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 904-918.

    Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1997). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434- 455.

    Brown, N., & Tan, S. (2011). Magnitude comparison revisited: An alternative approach to binary choice under uncertainty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 392- 398.

    Chen, M. H., Shao, Q. M., & Ibrahim, J. G. (2000). Monte Carlo Methods in Bayesian Computation. New York: Spinger-Verlag.

    Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). How good are simple heuristics? In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & The ABC Research Group (Eds.) (pp. 97-118). Oxford University Press.

    Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis (Second Ed). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451- 482.

    Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark