Palliative home-based technology from a practitioner's perspective: benefits and disadvantages

Article, Review English OPEN
Johnston BM (2014)
  • Publisher: Dove Medical Press
  • Journal: Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth (issn: 2253-1564)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.2147/SHTT.S42687
  • Subject: R855-855.5 | Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth | Medical technology

Bridget M Johnston Sue Ryder Care Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative, and End of Life Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK Abstract: This critical review paper explores the concept of palliative home-based technology from a practitioner's perspective. The aim of the critical review was to scope information available from published and unpublished research on the current state of palliative home-based technology, practitioner-focused perspectives, patient-focused perspectives, quality of life, and the implications for clinical practice. Published and unpublished studies were included. An example of one UK patient-centered home-based technology is explored as an exemplar. The evidence suggests that despite the challenges, there are numerous examples of good practice in relation to palliative home-based technology. Improvements in technology mean that telehealth has much to offer people being cared for at home with palliative needs. However, some of the evaluative evidence is limited, and further rigor is needed when evaluating future technology-based solutions innovations. Keywords: technology, telehealth, telemedicine, information technology, palliative care, hospice, terminal illness
  • References (67)
    67 references, page 1 of 7

    1. Scottish Government. Living and Dying Well: A National Action Plan for Palliative and End of Life Care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2008.

    2. Martin-Moreno J, Harris M, Gorgojo L, Clark D, Normand C, Carlos C. Palliative Care in the European Union. European Parliament Economic and Scientific Policy Department; 2008.

    3. Ahmedzai S, Costa A, Blengini C, et al. A new international framework for palliative care. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(15):2192-2200.

    4. World Health Organization. WHO denfiition of palliative care [web page on the Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/ definition/en /. Accessed September 9, 2014.

    5. Brown S. Next generation telecare and its role in primary and community care. Health Soc Care Community. 2003;11(6):4.

    6. Hughes R. Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(4):340-346.

    7. Scottish Government. Better Health, Better Care: Action Plan. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2007.

    8. Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Joseph BA, et al. Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. Am J Med. 2014;127(3):183-187.

    9. Smith AC. Telemedicine: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(1):5-7.

    10. Smith AC, Gray LC. Telemedicine across the ages. Med J Aust. 2009;190(1):15-19.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark