publication . Other literature type . Article . Preprint . 2017

Climate Change Helplessness and the (De)moralization of Individual Energy Behavior.

Erika Salomon; Jesse Lee Preston; Melanie B. Tannenbaum;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Mar 2017
  • Publisher: Open Science Framework
  • Country: United Kingdom
<p>Although most people understand the threat of climate change, they do little to modify their own energy conservation behavior. One reason for this gap between belief and behavior may be that individual actions seem un-impactful and therefore are not morally relevant. This research investigates how climate change helplessness—belief that one’s actions cannot affect climate change—can undermine the moralization of climate change and personal energy conservation. In Study 1, climate change efficacy predicted both moralization of energy use and energy conservation intentions beyond individual belief in climate change. In Studies 2 and 3, participants read informa...
free text keywords: Social Psychology, Psychology, FOS: Psychology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Q1, Moral reasoning, Learned helplessness, Climate change, Energy behavior, Energy conservation, Morality, media_common.quotation_subject, media_common, Self-efficacy, Energy consumption
Related Organizations
65 references, page 1 of 5

Bender, L. (Producer), Burns, S. Z. (Producer), David, L. (Producer) & Guggenheim, D. (Director). (2006). An Inconvenient Truth [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount Classics.

Burton, T. I. (2014, July 11). Pope Francis's radical environmentalism. The Atlantic. Retrieved from chive/2014/07/pope-franciss-radical-rethinking-of-environmentalism/374300/

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Effron, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2012). How the moralization of issues grants social legitimacy to act on one's attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 690-701. doi:10.1177/0146167211435982

Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Household carbon footprint calculator. Retrieved from:

Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Climate change impacts and adapting to climate change. Retrieved from -adaptation/

Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56-62. doi:10.1177/0956797612449177

Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40: 532-538. doi:10.1037/a0015808

Fielding, K. S., & Head, B. W. (2012). Determinants of young Australians' environmental actions: the role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 18, 171-186. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.592936

Fosco, E., & Geer, J. H. (1971). Effects of gaining control over aversive stimuli after differing amounts of no control. Psychological Reports, 29, 1153-1154. doi:10.2466/pr0.1971.29.3f.1153

Gallup News Service. (2013). Gallup poll social series: Environment. Washington, DC: Gallup.

Gifford, R. and Nilsson, A. (2014), Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141-157.

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141 [OpenAIRE]

Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2012). Two minds vs. two philosophies: Mind perception defines morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 405-423. doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0112-5 [OpenAIRE]

Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101-124. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387 [OpenAIRE]

65 references, page 1 of 5
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue