publication . Article . 2009

Creating Fair Lineups for Suspects With Distinctive Features

Zarkadi, T.; Wade, Ka; Neil Stewart;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Dec 2009 Journal: Psychological Science, volume 20, pages 1,448-1,453 (issn: 0956-7976, eissn: 1467-9280, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: SAGE Publications
  • Country: United Kingdom
Abstract
In their descriptions, eyewitnesses often refer to a culprit's distinctive facial features. However, in a police lineup, selecting the only member with the described distinctive feature is unfair to the suspect and provides the police with little further information. For fair and informative lineups, the distinctive feature should be either replicated across foils or concealed on the target. In the present experiments, replication produced more correct identifications in target-present lineups—without increasing the incorrect identification of foils in target-absent lineups—than did concealment. This pattern, and only this pattern, is predicted by the hybrid-sim...
Subjects
free text keywords: General Psychology, Police lineup, Social psychology, Psychology, Distinctive feature, Suspect, Cognitive psychology, HV, BF
Related Organizations
20 references, page 1 of 2

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.

Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processing in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105-116.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987a). The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233-258.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987b). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629-637.

Cutler, B. R., Penrod, S., O'Rourke, T. E., & Martens, R. K. (1986). Unconfounding the effect of contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Social Behavior, 2, 113-134.

Knapp, B. R., Nosofsky, R. M., & Busey, T. A. (2006). Recognizing distinctive faces: A hybrid-similarity exemplar model account. Memory and Cognition, 34, 877-889.

Luus, C. A., & Wells, G. L. (1991). Eyewitness identification and the selection of distractors for lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 43-57.

Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57. [OpenAIRE]

Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (2003). A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1194-1209. [OpenAIRE]

Patterson, K. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1977). When face recognition fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory, 3, 406-417.

Read, J. D. (1995). The availability heuristic in person identification ± the sometimes misleading consequences of enhanced contextual information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 91-121.

Read, J. D., Vokey, J. R., & Hammersley, R. (1990). Changing photos of faces: Effects of exposure duration and photo similarity on recognition and the accuracy-confidence relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 870-882.

Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447. [OpenAIRE]

Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.

Tversky, A. (1997). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.

20 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue
publication . Article . 2009

Creating Fair Lineups for Suspects With Distinctive Features

Zarkadi, T.; Wade, Ka; Neil Stewart;