publication . Article . 2017

Evaluation a Community Maternal Health Programme: Lessons Learnt

Sharma, Sheetal; Simkhada, Padam; Hundley, Vanora; Van Teijlingen, Edwin; Stephens, Jane; Silwal, R.C.; Angell, Catherine;
Open Access English
  • Published: 20 Jul 2017
  • Country: United Kingdom
Abstract Using the example of a community-based health promotion intervention, this paper explores the important triangle between health promotion theory, intervention design, and evaluation research. This paper first outlines the intervention and then the mixed-method evaluation. In 2007, a non-governmental organisation (NGO) designed and implemented an intervention to improve the uptake of maternal health provision in rural Nepal. A community-based needs assessment preceded this novel health-promotion intervention that empowered women with information on the benefits of seeking care. The intervention had a flexible design and, at several points, the interventi...
Related Organizations
26 references, page 1 of 2

1. Rogo K, Oucho J, Mwalali P. Maternal Mortality. In: Jamison D, Feachem R, Makgoba M, et al, editors. Disease and Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2006. Available from: ICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf?sequence=1

2. United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2011. New York, USA; 2011. Available from: MDG Report 2011_Book LR.pdf

3. Tey N-P, Lai S. Correlates of and barriers to the utilization of health services for delivery in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. ScientificWorldJournal [Internet]. 2013 Jan [cited 2016 Mar 17];2013:423403. Available from: rtype=abstract

4. WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, World Bank. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2012.

5. Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, Ahn SY, Wang M, Makela SM, et al. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980-2008: A systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet. 2010;375:1609-23.

6. Yanqiu G, Ronsmans C, Lin A. Time trends and regional differences in maternal mortality in China from 2000 to 2005. Bull World Health Organ. scielosp; 2009;87:913-20. Available from: 96862009001200011&nrm=iso [OpenAIRE]

7. UNFPA, ICM, WHO. The state of the world's midwifery 2014: A universal pathway. A woman's right to health. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2014.

8. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller A-B, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. Elsevier; 2014 Jun 6 [cited 2014 Jul 15];2(6):e323-33. Available from:

9. Ronsmans C, Graham WJ, group LMSS steering. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. [Internet]. Lancet. 2006. p. 1189-200. Available from: 011946

10. Central Intelligence Agency. The World Fact Book Nepal [Internet]. 2013. Available from:

11. Simkhada B, Porter M, van Teijlingen E. The role of mothers-in-law in antenatal care 12].

38. Bryers HM. Midwifery & Maternity Services in the Gaidhealtachd and the North of Scotland 1912-2005. University of Aberdeen.; 2010.

39. Khandker SR, Koolwal GB, Samad HA. Handbook of impact evaluation. Quantitative methods and practices. [Internet]. 2010. Available from: 0091210014322/Rendered/PDF/520990PUB0EPI1101Official0Use0Only1.pdf [OpenAIRE]

40. Hawe P, Degeling D, Hall J. Evaluating Health Promotion: A Health Worker's Guide [Internet]. MacLennan & Petty; 1990.

41. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:85. [OpenAIRE]

26 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue