This article contributes to the growing body of research that explores the significance of context in health information behavior. Specifically, through the lens of trust judgments, it demonstrates that gender is a determinant of the information evaluation process. A qu... View more
Adams, S. A. (2010). Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake -disciplinary literature and website review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(6), 391-400.
Atkinson, N. L., Saperstein, S. L., & Pleis, J. (2009). Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(1):e4.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(Spring), 74-94.
Bryman, B., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, W., Lee, K.-H., Straubhaar, J. D., & Spence, J. (2014). Getting a second opinion: social capital, digital inequalities, and health information repertoires. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2552-2563.
Cline, R. J. W., & Haynes, K. M. (2001). Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research, 16(6), 671-692.
Cockerham, W. (2005). Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure.
Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 46(1), 51-67.
Corritore, C., Wiedenbeck, S., Kracher, B., & Marble, R. P. (2012). Online Trust and Health Information Websites. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 8(4), 92- 115.
Kelton, K., Fleischman, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2008). Trust in digital information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3), 363-374.