Teaching psychology to computing students

Article English OPEN
Taylor, Jacqui (2008)
  • Subject: edu | psy
    acm: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION

The aim of this paper is twofold. The first aim is to discuss some observations gained from teaching Psychology to Computing students, highlighting both the wide range of areas where Psychology is relevant to Computing education and the topics that are relevant at different stages of students’ education. The second aim is to consider findings from research investigating the characteristics of Computing and Psychology students. It is proposed that this information could be considered in the design and use of Psychology materials for Computing students. \ud The format for the paper is as follows. Section one will illustrate the many links between the disciplines of Psychology & Computing; highlighting these links helps to answer the question that many Computing students ask, what can Psychology offer to Computing? Section two will then review some of the ways that I have been involved in teaching Psychology to Computing students, from A/AS level to undergraduate and postgraduate level. Section three will compare the profiles of Computing and Psychology students (e.g. on age, gender and motivation to study), to highlight how an understanding of these factors can be used to adapt Psychology teaching materials for Computing students. The conclusions which cover some practical suggestions are presented in section four.\ud
  • References (10)

    Dark, M. & Winstead, J. (2005). Using educational theory and moral psychology to inform the teaching of ethics in computing. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Information Security Curriculum Development, Kennesaw, Georgia, p27-31. ACM Press: New York Greene, J & Hiadt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgement work? Trens in Cognitive Science, 6(12), 517-523.

    Halpern, D.F. (1992). Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Johnson, D. (1985). Computer Ethics (1st edition). Prentice Hall.

    Johnson, D. (2001). Computer Ethics (3rd edition). Prentice Hall.

    Kohlberg, l. & Kramer, R. (1969). Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Human Development, 12, 93-120.

    Kolb, D.A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences, in: A.W. Chickering (Ed.) The Modern American College. San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.

    Layman, L., Cornwell, T. & Williams, L. (2006). Personality types, learning styles, and an agile approach to software engineering education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education SIGCSE '06, Volume 38(1), 428-432. ACM.

    Radford, J. Holdstock, L. (1995). Gender Differences in Higher Education Aims between Computing and Psychology Students. Research in Science and Technological Education, 13(2), p. 163 Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). Mature students in higher education: I. A literature survey on approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), 309 - 325 Taylor, J. (2002). Psychology and the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 233-40.

    Wilson, F. (2003). Can compute, won't compute: women's participation in the culture of computing. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18 (2), 127-142.

    LTSN (2004). ETHICS Project . http://prs.heacademy.ac.uk/archive/oldsite/ethics/

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Bournemouth University Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 3,104
Share - Bookmark